Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish

BioSystems

Volumn 71, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 169-177

  Rother, Diego ^a   Migliaro, Adriana ^a   Canetti, Rafael ^b   Gómez, Leonel ^a   Caputi, Angel ^c   Budelli, Ruben ^a  

^a Facultad de Ciencias   (Uruguay)

^b Inst de Ing Eléctrica   (Uruguay)

^c INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOLÓGICAS CLEMENTE ESTABLE   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Electric fish; Electric image; Electrolocation; Object interaction; Perception

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL PROPERTY; FISH;

CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRIC FISH; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; ELECTRORECEPTOR; IMAGE DISPLAY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; SIMULATION; SKIN; STIMULUS; TAIL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ELECTRIC FISH; MORMYRIDAE;

EID: 0142122073     PISSN: 03032647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0303-2647(03)00124-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Aguilera P.A., Castello M.E., Caputi A.A. Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: differences between self-generated and conspecific-generated signal carriers. J. Exp. Biol. 204:2001;185-198.
2. Assad, C., 1997. Electric Field Maps and Boundary Element Simulations of Electrolocation in Weakly Electric Fish. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
3. Bastian, J., 1986. Electrolocation. In: Bullock, T., Heiligemberg, W. (Eds.), Electroreception. Wiley, New York.
4. Bell C. Sensory coding and corollary discharge effects in mormyrid electric fish. J. Exp. Biol. 146:1989;229-253.
5. Bregman, A., 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Budelli R., Caputi A. The electrical image in weakly electric fish: perception of complex impedance objects. J. Exp. Physiol. 203:2000;481-492.
7. Caputi A., Budelli R., Grant K., Bell C. The electric image in weakly electric fish: II. Physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. J. Exp. Biol. 201:1998;2115-2128.
8. von der Emde G., Bleckmann H. Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurments in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 171:1992;683-694.
9. von der Emde G., Schwarz S., Gomez L., Budelli R., Grant K. Electric fish measure distance in the dark. Nature. 395:1998;890-894.
10. Heiligenberg W. Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish Eigenmannia rhamphichthyidae Gymnotoidei. J. Comp. Physiol. 87:1973;137-164.
11. Hoshimiya N., Shogen K., Matsuo T., Chichibu S. The Apteronotus electric organ discharge field waveform and electric organ discharge field simulation. J. Comp. Physiol. 135:1980;283-290.
12. Hunter, P., Pullan, A., 2001. FEM/BEM Notes. http//www.esc.auckland.ac.nz/Academic/Texts/fembemnotes.pdf.
13. Jackson, J., 1975. Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York,
14. Kohonen, T., 1984. Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Lissmann H.W., Machin K.E. The mechanisms of object location in Gymnarchus niloticus and similar fish. J. Exp. Biol. 35:1958;457-486.
16. Rasnow B. The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 178:1996;397-411.
17. Rasnow B., Bower J.M. The electric organ discharges of the Gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 178:1996;383-396.
18. Sears, F.W., Zemanski, M.W., 1955. University Physics, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
19. Yost W.A. Auditory image perception and analysis: the basis for hearing. Hearing Res. 56:1991;8-18.
20. Zahorik, P., 1996. Auditory Distance Perception: A Literature Review. http://www.waisman.wisc.edu/~zahorik/papers/dist.html.