Complexity science and homeopathy: A synthetic overview

Homeopathy

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 203-212

  Bellavite, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chaos; Complex systems; Complexity theory; Disease dynamics; Dynamic systems; Oscillations

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DYNAMICS; EDUCATION; HOMEOPATHY; MODEL; OSCILLATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SCIENCE; THEORY;

EID: 0142121330     PISSN: 14754916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2003.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Braunwald E, Hauser SL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, Kasper DL, Jameson JL. What is expected of the physician. The practice of medicine. In: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 15th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp 1-5.
2. Cramer F. Chaos and order. The Complex Structure of Living Systems. Weinheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993.
3. Weiss JN, Garfinkel A, Spano ML, Ditto WL. Chaos and chaos control in biology. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1355-1360.
4. Mainzer K. Thinking in Complexity. The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1994.
5. Nicolis G. Introduction to Nonlinear Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
6. Kauffman SA. At Home in the Universe. The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
7. Goldberger AL. Non-linear dynamics for clinicians: chaos theory, fractals, and complexity at the bedside. Lancet 1996; 347: 1312-1314.
8. Williams GP. Chaos Theory Tamed. London: Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
9. Bar-Yam Y. Dynamics of Complex Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.
10. Coffey DS. Self-organization, complexity and chaos: the new biology for medicine. Nature Med 1998; 4: 882-885.
11. Holland JH. Emergence. From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
12. Wilson T, Holt T. Complexity and clinical care. Br Med J 2001; 323: 685-688.
13. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. Br Med J 2001; 323: 625-628.
14. Bellavite P, Signorini A. The Emerging Science of Homeopathy. Complexity, Biodynamics, and Nanopharmacology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic, 2002.
15. Torres JL. Homeopathic effect: a network perspective. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 89-94.
16. Bell IR, Baldwin CM, Schwartz GE. Translating a nonlinear systems theory model for homeopathy into empirical tests. Altern Ther Health Med 2002; 8: 58-66.
17. Hyland ME, Lewith GT. Oscillatory effects in a homeopathic clinical trial: an explanation using complexity theory, and implications for clinical practice. Br Hom J 2002; 9: 145-149.
18. Oberbaum M, Cambar J. Hormesis: dose-dependent reverse effects of low and very low doses. In: Endler PC, Schulte J (eds). Ultra High Dilution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 5-18.
19. Bellavite P, Lussignoli S, Semizzi M, Ortolani R, Signorini A. The similia principle. From cellular models to regulation of homeostasis. Br Hom J 1997; 86: 73-85.
20. Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA. Hormesis as a biological hypothesis. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106 (Suppl 1): 357-362.
21. Olivieri G. Adaptive response and its relationship to hormesis and low dose cancer risk estimation. Hum Exp Toxicol 1999; 18: 440-442.
22. Bellavite P, Chirumbolo S, Santonastaso C, Biasi D, Lussignoli S, Andrioli G. Dose-dependence of the various functional responses of neutrophils to formylpeptides. Activation, regulation, and inverse effects according to the agonist dose and cell condition. In: Bastide M (ed). Signals and Images. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp 111-119.
23. Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Worku F, Wagner H, Eitel F. Critical review and meta-analysis of serial agitated dilutions in experimental toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 1994; 13: 481-492.
24. Wiegant FAC, Van Wijk R. Self-recovery and the similia principle: an experimental model. Complement Ther Med 1996; 4: 90-97.
25. Bond RA. Is paradoxical pharmacology a strategy worth pursuing? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001; 22: 273-276.
26. Eskinazi D. Homeopathy re-revisited: is homeopathy compatible with biomedical observations? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 1981-1987.
27. Teixeira MZ. Homeopathic use of modern medicines: utilisation of the curative rebound effect. Med Hypotheses 2003; 60: 276-283.
28. Lombardi, F. Chaos theory, heart rate variability, and arrhythmic mortality. Circulation 2000; 101: 8-10.
29. Faure P, Korn H. Is there chaos in the brain? I. Concepts of nonlinear dynamics and methods of investigation. C R Acad Sci III. 2001; 324: 773-793.
30. Ruiz G, Torres JL, Michel O, Navarro R. Homeopathic effect on heart rate variability. Br Hom J 1999; 88: 106-111.
31. Torres JL, Ruiz G. Stochastic resonance and the homoeopathic effect. Br Hom J 1996; 85: 134-140.
32. Torres JL. Enhanced susceptibility in homeopathic experiments. In: Fisher P, Van Haselen R (eds.) Improving the Success of Homeopathy 4. London: Royal London Homeopathic Hospital, 2003, pp 16-20.
33. Rubik B. The biofield hypothesis: its biophysical basis and role in medicine. J Alt Compl Med 2002; 8: 703-717.
34. van Rossum JM, de Bie JEGM. Chaos and illusion. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1991; 12: 379-383.
35. Garner C, Hock N. Chaos theory and homoeopathy. Berlin J Res Hom 1991; 1: 236-242.
36. Shepperd J. Chaos theory: implications for homeopathy. J Am Inst Homeopathy 1994; 87: 22-29.
37. Schwartz GE, Russek LG, Bell IR, Riley D. Plausibility of homeopathy and conventional chemical therapy: the systemic memory resonance hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2000; 54: 634-637.
38. Lorenz I, Schneider EM, Stolz P, Brack A, Strube J. Influence of the diluent on the effect of highly diluted histamine on basophil activation. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 11-18.
39. Brizzi M, Nani D, Peruzzi M, Betti L. Statistical analysis of the effect of high dilutions of arsenic in a large dataset from a wheat germination model. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 63-67.
40. Betti L, Boghini F, Nani D. Plant models for fundamental research in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 129-130.
41. Markus M, Hess B. Transitions between oscillators models in a glycolytic model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81: 4394-4398.
42. Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 27-33.
43. Lewith GT, Watkins AD, Hyland ME, et al. Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite: double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Med J 2002; 324: 520.
44. Reilly DT, Taylor MA, Beattie NG, et al. Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible? Lancet 1994; 344: 1601-1606.
45. Ho MW, Popp FA, Warnke U. Bioelectrodynamics and Biocommunication. Singapore: World Scientific, 1994.
46. Bell IR, Baldwin CM, Schwartz GE, Davidson JR. Homeopathic constitutional type questionnaire correlates of conventional psychological and physical health scales: individual difference characteristics of young adults. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 63-74.
47. Bell IR, Baldwin CM, Schwartz GE. Sensitization studies in chemically intolerant individuals: implications for individual difference research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001; 933: 38-47.
48. Bell IR, Koithan M, Gorman MM, Baldwin CM. Homeopathic practitioner views of changes in patients undergoing constitutional treatment for chronic disease. J Altern Complement Med 2003; 9: 39-50.
49. Walach H, Schamell U, Springer W, Stritzl G, Haag G. The long-term effects of homeopathic treatment of chronic headaches: one year follow-up and single case time series analysis. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 63-72.
50. Muscari Tomaioli G., Allegri F., Miali E, et al. Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment. Br Hom J 2001; 90: 189-197.
51. Heger M, Riley DS, Haidvogl M. International integrative primary care outcomes study (IIPCOS-2): an international research project of homeopathy in primary care. Br Hom J 2000; 89 (Suppl 1): S10-S13.
52. Riley D, Fischer M, Singh B, Haidvogl M, Heger M. Homeopathy and conventional medicine: an outcomes study comparing effectiveness in a primary care setting. J Altern Complement Med 2001; 7: 149-159.
53. Schulte J. Conservation of structure in aqueous ultra high dilutions. In: Endler PC, Schulte J (eds.) Ultra High Dilutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 105-115.
54. Smith CW. Electromagnetic and magnetic vector potential bioinformation and water. In: Endler PC, Schulte J (eds.) Ultra High Dilution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 187-201.
55. Fesenko EE, Geletyuk VI, Kazachenko VN, Chemeris NK. Preliminary microwave irradiation of water solutions changes their channel-modifying activity. FEBS Lett 1995; 366: 49-52.
56. Liu K, Brown MG, Carter C, Saykally RJ, Gregory JK, Clary DC. Characterization of a cage form of the water hexamer. Nature 1996; 381: 501-503.
57. Widakowich J. Microdose therapy: dilution versus potentiation? Med Hypotheses 1997; 49: 437-441.
58. Gregory JK, Clary DC, Liu K, Brown MG, Saykally RJ. The water dipole moment in water clusters. Science 1997; 275: 814-817.
59. Elia V, Niccoli M. Thermodynamics of extremely diluted aqueous solutions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 879: 241-248.
60. Schulte J. Effects of potentization in aqueous solutions. Br Hom J 1999; 88: 155-160.
61. Zacharias CR. Physical research in dynamized systems. Med Hypotheses 2002; 58: 523-526.
62. Del Giudice E, Preparata G, Vitiello G. Water as a free electric dipole laser. Phys Rev Lett 1988; 61: 1085-1088.
63. Preparara G. Regimi coerenti in Fisica e Biologia. Il problema della forma. Riv Biol/Biol Forum 1997; 90: 434-436.
64. Bell IR, Lewis DA, Brooks AJ, Lewis SE, Schwartz GE. Gas discharge visualization evaluation of ultramolecular doses of homeopathic medicines under blinded, controlled conditions. J Altern Complement Med 2003; 9: 25-38.
65. Rey L. Thermoluminescence of ultra-high dilutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Physics A 2003; 323: 67-74.
66. Milgrom LR. Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 1: a qualitative, non-local metaphor for homeopathy based on quantum theory. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 239-248.
67. Milgrom LR. Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 2: Extending the metaphor for homeopathy using molecular quantum theory. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 35-43.
68. Walach H. Magic of signs: a non-local interpretation of homeopathy. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 127-140.
69. Callard R, George AJ, Stark J. Cytokines, chaos, and complexity. Immunity 1999; 11: 507-513.
70. Thomas AP, Bird GS, Hajnoczky G, Robb-Gaspers LD, Putney Jr JW. Spatial and temporal aspects of cellular calcium signalling. FASEB J. 1996; 10: 1505-1517.
71. Talmud, P.J., Humphries, S. Molecular genetic analysis of coronary artery disease: an example of a multifactorial disease. In: McGee, JOD (ed). Oxford Textbook of Pathology. Vol 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 126-138.
72. Bellavite, P. Disease as information disorder. Advances-J of Body-Mind Health 1997; 13: 4-7.
73. Kyriazis M. Practical applications of chaos theory to the modulation of human ageing: nature prefers chaos to regularity. Biogerontology 2003; 4: 75-90.
74. Bellavite P, Semizzi M, Lussignoli S, Andrioli G, Bartocci U. A computer model of the five elements theory of traditional Chinese medicine. Complement Ther Med 1998; 6: 133-140.
75. Bernal G, Bellavite P, Wynn S, Searcy R, Fernandez R, Kayne S. Homeopathic terminology: A consensus quest. Br Hom J 1999; 88: 135-141.
76. Dokoumetzidis A, Iliadis A, Macheras P. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory: concepts and applications relevant to pharmacodynamics. Pharm Res 2001; 18: 415-426.