Responses of bryophytes to simulated environmental change at Latnjajaure, northern Sweden

Journal of Bryology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 163-168

  Jägerbrand, Annika K ^a   Molau, Ulf ^a   Alatalo, Juha M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bryophytes; Fertilizer application; Simulated environmental change; Subarctic; Temperature

Indexed keywords

AULACOMNIUM; AULACOMNIUM TURGIDUM; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; DICRANUM; DICRANUM GROENLANDICUM; HYLOCOMIUM SPLENDENS; PTERIDOPHYTA; PTILIDIUM; PTILIDIUM CILIARE; RHYTIDIUM RUGOSUM;

EID: 0142116188     PISSN: 03736687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/037366803235001634     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berendse F, Jonasson S. 1992. Nutrient use and nutrient cycling in northern ecosystems. In: Chapin III FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, eds. Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. An ecophysiological perspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 337-356.
2. Bergamini A, Pauli D. 2001. Effects of increased nutrient supply on bryophytes in montane calcareous fens. Journal of Bryology 23: 331-339.
3. Callaghan TV, Press MC, Lee JA, Robinson DL, Anderson CW. 1999. Spatial and temporal variability in the responses of Arctic terrestrial ecosystems to environmental change. Polar Research 18: 191-197.
4. Chapin III FS, Shaver GR. 1985. Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology 66: 564-576.
5. Chapin III FS, Shaver GR, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Laundre JA. 1995. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate. Ecology 76: 694-711.
6. Furness SB, Grime JP. 1982. Growth rate and temperature responses in bryophytes. 2. A comparative study of species of contrasted ecology. Journal of Ecology 70: 523-536.
7. Gerson U. 1982. Bryophytes and invertebrates. In: Smith. AJE, ed. Bryophyte ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, 291-332.
8. Gordon C, Wynn JM, Woodin SJ. 2001. Impacts of increased nitrogen supply on high Arctic heath: the importance of bryophytes and phosphorus availability. New Phylologist 149: 461-471.
9. Graglia E, Jonasson S, Michelsen A, Schmidt IK, Havström M, Gustavsson L. 2001. Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments. Ecography 24: 5-12.
10. Havström M, Callaghan TV, Jonasson S. 1993. Differential growth responses of Cassiope tetragona, an arctic dwarf-shrub, to environmental perturbations among three contrasting high- and subarctic sites. Oikos 66: 389-402.
11. Henry GHR, Molau U. 1997. Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment - Introduction. Global Change Biology 3 (Suppl. 1): 1-9.
12. Jonasson S. 1992. Plant responses and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality. Oikos 63: 420-429.
13. Kallio P, Heinonen S. 1973. Ecology of Rhacomitrium lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid. Report of the Kevo Subarctic Research Station 10: 43-54.
14. Kallio P, Saarnio E. 1986. The effect on mosses of transplantation to different latitudes. Journal of Bryology 14: 159-178.
15. Kielland K, Chapin III FS. 1992. Nutrient absorption and accumulation in arctic plants. In: Chapin III FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, eds. Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. An ecophysiological perspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 321-335.
16. Longton RE. 1982. Bryophyte vegetation in polar regions. In: Smith AJE, ed. Bryophyte ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, 123-165.
17. Longton RE. 1984. The role of bryophytes in terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 55: 147-163.
18. Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman DW, Johnstone J, Jones G, Jones MH, Levesque E, Molau U, Molgaard P, Parsons AN, Svoboda J, Virginia RA. 1997. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biology 3: 20-32.
19. Maxwell B. 1992. Arctic climate: potential for change under global warming. In: Chapin III FS, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, eds. Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate. An ecophysiological perspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 11-34.
20. Mitchell JFB, Manabe S, Meleshko V, Tokioka T. 1990. Equlibrium climate change and its implications for the future. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ, eds. Climate change, the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131-172.
21. Molau U. 2001. Tundra plant responses to experimental and natural temperature changes. Memoirs of the Natlional Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue 54: 445-466.
22. Molau U, Alatalo JM. 1998. Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants. Ambio 27: 322-329.
23. Oechel WC, Sveinbjörnsson B. 1978. Primary production processes in arctic bryophytes at Barrow, Alaska. In: Tieszen LL, ed. Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan arctic tundra. Ecological studies 29. New York: Springer-Verlag, 269-298.
24. Parsons AN, Press MC, Wookey PA, Welker JM, Robinson CH, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1995. Growth responses of Calamagrostis lapponica to simulated environmental change in the Sub-arctic. Oikos 72: 61-66.
25. Parsons AN, Welker JM, Wookey PA, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1994. Growth responses of four sub-Arctic dwarf shrubs to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology 82: 307-318.
26. Press MC, Potter JA, Burke MJW, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1998. Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change. Journal of Ecology 86: 315-327.
27. Potter JA, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1995. Growth responses of Polytrichum commune and Hylocomium splendens to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. New Phytologist 131: 533-541.
28. Proctor MCF. 1982. Physiological ecology: water relations, light and temperature responses, carbon balance. In: Smith AJE, ed. Bryophyte ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, 333-381.
29. Russell S. 1990. Bryophyte production and decomposition in tundra ecosystems. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 3-22.
30. Skre O, Oechel WC. 1979. Moss production in a black spruce Picea mariana forest with permafrost near Fairbanks, Alaska, as compared with two permafrost-free stands. Holoarctic Ecology 2: 249-254.
31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Third edition. New York: WH Freeman and Company.
32. Steere WC. 1978. Floristics, phytogeography, and ecology of arctic alaskan bryophytes. In: Tieszen LL, ed. Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan arctic tundra. Ecological studies 29. New York: Springer-Verlag, 141-167.
33. Vitt DH. 1990. Growth and production dynamics of boreal mosses over climatic, chemical and topographic gradients. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 35-59.
34. Vitt DH, Pakarinen P. 1977. The bryophyte vegetation production and organic components of Truelove Lowland. In Bliss LC, ed. Truelove Lowland, Canada: a high Arctic ecosystem. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 225-244.
35. Webber PJ. 1978. Spatial and temporal variation of the vegetation and its production, Barrow, Alaska. In: Tieszen LL, ed. Vegetation and production ecology of an alaskan arctic tundra. Ecological studies 29. New York, Springer-Verlag, 37-112.
36. Wielgolaski FE, Bliss LC, Svoboda J, Doyle G. 1981. Primary production of tundra. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ, eds. Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 187-226.
37. Wookey PA, Welker JM, Parsons AN, Press MC, Callaghan TV, Lee JA. 1994. Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert. Oikos 70: 131-139.
38. Zechmeister HG. 1995. Growth of five pleurocarpous moss species under various climatic conditions. Journal of Bryology 18: 455-468.