Economic effect of endangered species preservation in the non-metropolitan west

Growth and Change

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 263-288

  Duffy Deno, Kevin T ^a  

^a WESTMINSTER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142095923     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1997.tb00980.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Carlino, G.A., and E.S. Mills. 1987. The determinants of county growth, Journal of Regional Science 27: 39-54.
2. Clark, D.E., and C.A. Murphy. 1996. Countywide employment and population growth: An analysis of the 1980's, Journal of Regional Science 36: 235-256.
3. Evans, A.H. 1990. The assumption of equilibrium in the analysis of migration and interregional differences: A review of some recent research, Journal of Regional Science 30: 515-531.
4. _. 1993. Interregional equilibrium: A transatlantic view, Journal of Regional Science 33: 89-97.
5. Flather, C.H., L.A. Joyce, and C.A. Bloomgarden. 1994. Species endangerment patterns in the United States, general technical report RM-241, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, USFS.
6. Graves, P.E., and P.R. Mueser. 1993. The role of equilibrium and disequilibrium in modeling regional growth and decline: A critical reassessment, Journal of Regional Science 33: 69-84.
7. Greene, W.H. 1993. Econometric analysis, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
8. Harrigan, F.J., and P.G. McGregor. 1993. Equilibrium and disequilibrium perspectives on regional labor migration, Journal of Regional Science, 33: 49-67.
9. Hoehn, J.P., M.C. Berger, and G.C. Blomquist. 1987. A hedonic model of interregional wages, rent, and amenity values, Journal of Regional Science, 27: 605-620.
10. Knapp, T.A., and P.E. Graves. 1989. On the role of amenities in models of migration and regional development, Journal of Regional Science, 29: 71-87.
11. McDonald, J.F. 1992. Assessing the development status of metropolitan areas, in Sources of Metropolitan Growth, edited by E. Mills and J.F. McDonald. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
12. Metrick, A., and M.L. Weitzman. 1996. Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation, Land Economics 72 (Feb.): 1-16.
13. Meyer, S.M. 1995. Endangered species listings and state economic performance, Project on Environmental Politics and Policy working paper, Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March.
14. Power, T.M. 1996. Lost landscapes and failed economies: The search for a value of place. Washington DC: Island Press.
15. Roback, J. 1982. Wages, rents, and the quality of life, Journal of Political Economy, 90: 1257-1278.
16. _. 1988. Wages, rents, and amenities: Differences among workers and regions, Economic Inquiry 26: 23-41.
17. Schachter, J., and P.G. Althaus. 1993. The assumption of equilibrium in models of migration, Journal of Regional Science 33: 85-88.
18. Smith, A., M. Moote, and C. Schwalbe. 1993. The endangered species act at twenty: An analytical survey of federal endangered species protection, Natural Resources Journal, 33 (Fall): 1027-1056.
19. Souder, J.A. 1993. Chasing armadillos down yellow lines: Economics in the Endangered Species Act, Natural Resources Journal 33 (Fall): 1095-1139.
20. Steinnes, D.N., and W.D. Fisher. 1974. An econometric model of intraurban location, Journal of Regional Science 14: 65-80.
21. Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy 64: 416-424.
22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Internet Site, http://www.fws.gov.
23. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1992. Endangered Species Act: Types and numbers of implementing actions, GAO/RCED-92-131BR.
24. White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48: 817-838.