Collaboration in the new millennium

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-11

  Piper, William E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142094890     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713663849     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Azim, H. F. A., Piper, W. E., Segal, P. M., Nixon, G. W. H., & Duncan, S. (1991). The quality of object relations scale. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 55, 323–343.
2. Benjamin, L. S. (1993). Every psychopathology is a gift of love. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 1–24.
3. Connelly, J. L., & Piper, W. E. (1989). An analysis of pretraining work behavior as a composition variable in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 173–189.
4. Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). The interpersonal interior of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 1–16.
5. Donenberg, G. R., Lyons, J. S., & Howard, K. I. (1999). Clinical trials versus mental health services research: Contributions and connections. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1135–1146.
6. Fishman, D. B. (2000). Transcending the efficacy versus effectiveness research debate: Proposal for a new, electronic “Journal of Pragmatic Case Studies.” Prevention & Treatment [On-line], 3. Available: http://journals.apa.org./prevention/volume3/pre0030008a.html.
7. Goldfried, M. R. (2000). Consensus in psychotherapy research and practice: Where have all the findings gone? Psychotherapy Research, 10, 1–16.
8. Grawe, K. (1997). Research-informed psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 1–19.
9. Greenberg, L. S. (1991). Research on the process of change. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 3–16.
10. Hill, C. H. (1996). Dreams and therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 1–15.
11. Hill, W. F. (1965). Hill Interaction Matrix. Unpublished manuscript. Los Angeles: University of California, Youth Study Center.
12. Høglend, P., & Piper, W. E. (1995). Focal adherence in brief dynamic psychotherapy: A comparison of findings from two independent studies. Psychotherapy, 32, 618–628.
13. Horowitz, L. M. (1994). Pschemas, psychopathology, and psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 1–19.
14. Joyce, A. S., Duncan, S. C., & Piper, W. E. (1995). A task analysis of “working” responses to dynamic interpretation in short-term individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 49–62.
15. Kachele, H. (1992). Narration and observation in psychotherapy research: Reporting on a 20 year long journey from qualitative case reports to quantitative studies on the psychoanalytic process. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 1–15.
16. Krause, M. S., & Howard, K. I. (1999). “Between-group psychotherapy research and basic science” revisited. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 159–170.
17. McCallum, M., & Piper, W. E. (Eds.). (1997). Psychological mindedness: A contemporary under standing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. McCallum, M., Piper, W. E., & O’Kelly, J. (1997). Predicting patient benefit from a group oriented, evening treatment program. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 47, 291–314.
19. Miklowitz, D. J., & Clarkin, J. F. (1999). Balancing internal and external validity. Prevention & Treatment [On-line], 2. Available: http://journals.apa.org./prevention/volume2/pre0020004c.html.
20. Norquist, G., Lebowitz, B., & Hyman, S. (1999). Expanding the frontier of treatment research. Prevention & Treatment [On-line], 2. Available: http://journals.apa.org./prevention/volume2/pre0020001a.html.
21. Piper, W. E., Azim, H. F. A., McCallum, M., & Joyce, A. S. (1990). Patient suitability and outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 475–481.
22. Piper, W. E., Debbane, E. G., Bienvenu, J. P., & Garant, J. (1984). A comparative study of four forms of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 268–279.
23. Piper, W. E., Debbane, E. G, de Carufel, F. L., & Bienvenu, J. P. (1987). A system for differentiating therapist interpretations and other interventions. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 51, 532–550.
24. Piper, W. E., Debbane, E. G., & Garant, J. (1977). An outcome study of group therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 1027–1032.
25. Piper, W. E., Debbane, E. G., Garant, J., & Bienvenu, J. P. (1979). Pretraining for group psychotherapy: A cognitive-experiential approach. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 1250–1256.
26. Piper, W. E., Doan, B. D., Edwards, E. M., & Jones, B. D. (1979). Cotherapy behavior, group therapy process and treatment outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1081– 1089.
27. Piper, W. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1999). Object relations theory and short-term dynamic psychotherapy: Findings from the Quality of Object Relations Scale. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 669–686.
28. Piper, W. E., Joyce, A. S., McCallum, M., & Azim, H. F. A. (1998). Interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 558–567.
29. Piper, W. E., McCallum, M., & Azim, H. F. A. (1992). Adaptation to loss through short-term group psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.
30. Piper, W. E., McCallum, M., Joyce, A. S., Azim, H. F., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (1999). Follow-up findings for interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 267–273.
31. Piper, W. E., Rosie, J. S., Joyce, A. S., & Azim, H. F. A. (1996). Time-limited day treatment for personality disorders: Integration of research and practice in a group program. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Shapiro, D. A. (1995). Finding out how psychotherapies help people change. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 1–21.
33. Stiles, W. B. (1999). Signs and voices in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 1–21.