Consequences of Interspecies Antennal Imaginal Disc Transplantation on Organization of Olfactory Glomeruli and Pheromone Blend Discrimination

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 466, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 377-388

  Vickers, Neil J ^a   Poole, Kathy ^b   Linn Jr , Charles E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Antennal lobe; Helicoverpa zea; Heliothis virescens; Olfaction; Pheromone

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CELL SPECIFICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DONOR; FLIGHT; HELICOVERPA ZEA; HELIOTHIS VIRESCENS; IMAGINAL DISC; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSECT DEVELOPMENT; LARVA; MALE; METAMORPHOSIS; MOTH; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY NERVE; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TISSUE STRUCTURE; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTHS; OLFACTORY NERVE; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VIBRISSAE;

EID: 0142094637     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.10890     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Almaas TJ, Christensen TA, Mustaparta H. 1991. Chemical communication in heliothine moths I. Antennal receptor neurons encode several features of intra- and interspecific odorants in the male corn earworm moth Helicoverpa zea. J Comp Physiol A 169:249-258.
2. Baker TC, Ochieng SA, Cossé AA, Lee SG, Todd JL, Quero C, Vickers NJ. Comparative responses of the olfactory receptor neurons of Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens to their sex pheromone components. J Comp Physiol A (in press).
3. Berg BG, Almaas TJ, Bjaalie JG, Mustaparta H. 1998. The macroglomerular complex of the antennal lobe in the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens: specified subdivision in four compartments according to information about biologically significant compounds. J Comp Physiol A 183:669-682.
4. Berg BG, Galizia CG, Brandt R, Mustaparta H. 2002. Digital atlases of the antennal lobe in two species of tobacco budworm moths, the oriental Helicoverpa assulta (male) and the american Heliothis virescens (male and female). J Comp Neurol 446:123-134.
5. Bozza T, Feinstein P, Zheng C, Mombaerts P. 2002. Odorant receptor expression defines functional units in the mouse olfactory system. J Neurosci 22:3033-3043.
6. Cho S, Mitchell A, Regier JC, Mitter C, Poole RW, Friedlander TP, Zhao S. 1995. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: elongation factor-1 alpha recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Mol Biol Evol 12:650-656.
7. Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Hildebrand JG. 1991. Chemical communication in heliothine moths II. Central processing of intra- and interspecific olfactory messages in the male com earworm moth Helicoverpa zea. J Comp Physiol A 169:259-274.
8. Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Hildebrand JG. 1995. Chemical communication in heliothine moths VI. Parallel pathways for information processing in the macroglomerular complex of the male tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens. J Comp Physiol A 177:545-557.
9. Cossé AA, Todd JL, Baker TC. 1998. Neurons discovered in male Helicoverpa zea antennae that correlate with pheromone-mediated attraction and interspecific antagonism. J Comp Physiol A 182:585-594.
10. Fang QQ, Cho S, Regier JC, Mitter C, Matthews M, Poole RW, Friedlander TP, Zhao S. 1997. A new nuclear gene for insect phylogenetics: DOPA decarboxylase is informative of relationships within heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Syst Biol 46:269-283.
11. Friedrich RW, Korsching SI. 1997. Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 18:737-752.
12. Galizia CG, Sachse S, Mustaparta H. 2000. Calcium responses to pheromone and plant odours in the antennal lobe of the male and female moth Heliothis virescens. J Comp Physiol A 186:1049-1063.
13. Hansson BS, Ljungberg H, Hallberg E, Lofstedt C. 1992. Functional specialization of olfactory glomeruli in a moth. Science 256:1313-1315.
14. Hansson BS, Almaas TJ, Anton S. 1995. Chemical communication in heliothine moths V. Antennal lobe projection patterns of pheromonedetecting olfactory receptor neurons in the male Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Comp Physiol A 177:535-543.
15. Held LI. 2002. Imaginal discs. Oxford: Cambridge University Press. 460 p.
16. Hildebrand JG, Shepherd GM. 1997. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:595-631.
17. Joerges J, Kuttner A, Balizia C, Giovanni C, Menzel R. 1997. Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honeybee brain. Nature 387:285-288.
18. Jurenka R, Jacquin E, Roelofs WL. 1991. Control of the biosynthetic pathway in Helicoverpa zea by the pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 17:81-91.
19. Kauer JS. 2002. On the scents of smell in the salamander. Nature 417: 336-342.
20. Lavenseau L. 1982. Determination of the sex of caterpillars without dissection. J Insect Morphol Embryol 11:359-362.
21. Lei H, Christensen TA, Hildebrand JG. 2002. Local inhibition modulates odor-evoked synchronization of glomerulus-specific output neurons. Nat Neurosci 5:557-565.
22. Leise EM. 1990. Modular construction of nervous systems: a basic principle of design for invertebrates and vertebrates. Brain Res Rev 15:1-23.
23. Linn CJ, Poole K, Zhang A, Roelofs WL. 1999. Pheromone-blend discrimination by European corn borer moths with inter-race and inter-sex antennal transplants. J Comp Physiol A 184:273-278.
24. Mombaerts P, Wang F, Dulac C, Chao SK, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Edmondson J, Axel R. 1996. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87:675-686.
25. Mori K, Nagao H, Yoshihara Y. 1999. The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. Science 286:711-715.
26. Ochieng S, Poole K, Linn CE, Vickers NJ, Roelofs WL, Baker TC. 2003. Unusual pheromone receptor neuron responses in heliothine moth antennae derived from inter-species imaginal disc transplantation. J Comp Physiol A 189:19-28.
27. Oland LA, Pott WM, Higgins MR, Tolbert LP. 1998. Targeted ingrowth and glial relationships of olfactory receptor axons in the primary olfactory pathway of an insect. J Comp Neurol 398:119-138.
28. Rössler W, Oland LA, Higgins MR, Hildebrand JG, Tolbert LP. 1999a. Development of a glia-rich axon-sorting zone in the olfactory pathway of the moth Manduca sexta. J Neurosci 19:9865-9877.
29. Rössler W, Randolph PW, Tolbert LP, Hildebrand JG. 1999b. Axons of olfactory receptor cells of transsexually grafted antennae induce development of sexually dimorphic glomeruli in Manduca sexta. J Neurobiol 38:521-541.
30. Schneiderman AM, Matsumoto SG, Hildebrand JG. 1982. Trans-sexually grafted antennae influence development of sexually dimorphic neurons in moth brain. Nature 298:844-846.
31. Tisay KT, B Key. 1999. The extracellular matrix modulates olfactory neurite outgrowth on ensheathing cells. J Neurosci 19:9890-9899.
32. Tolbert LP, Sirianni PA. 1990. Requirement for olfactory axons in the induction and stabilization of olfactory glomeruli in an insect. J Comp Neurol 298:69-82.
33. Vickers NJ. 2002. Defining a synthetic pheromone blend attractive to male Heliothis subflexa under wind tunnel conditions. J Chem Ecol 28:1255-1267.
34. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Mustaparta H, Baker TC. 1991. Chemical communication in heliothine moths III. Flight behavior of male Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens in response to varying ratios of intra- and interspecific sex pheromone components. J Comp Physiol A 169:275-280.
35. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Hildebrand JG. 1998. Combinatorial odor discrimination in the brain: attractive and antagonist odor blends are represented in distinct combinations of uniquely identifiable glomeruli. J Comp Neurol 400:35-56.
36. Willis MA, Butler MA, Tolbert LP. 1995. Normal glomerular organization of the antennal lobes is not necessary for odor-modulated flight in female moths. J Comp Physiol A 176:205-216.