A comparison of migration behaviour in Japan and Britain using spatial interaction models

International Journal of Population Geography

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 419-431

  Yano, Keiji ^a   Nakaya, Tomoki ^a   Fotheringham, A Stewart ^b   Openshaw, Stan ^c   Ishikawa, Yoshitaka ^d  

^a RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Britain; Counter urbanisation; Distance decay; Japan; Migration; Spatial competition; Spatial interaction; Urbanisation

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTERNAL MIGRATION; MIGRATION DETERMINANT; MOBILITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

JAPAN; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0142094593     PISSN: 10773495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijpg.297     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amrhein CG, Flowerdew R. 1992. The effect of data aggregation on a Poisson regression model of Canadian migration. Environment and Planning A 24: 1381-1391.
2. Asahi-Shinbun-Shya. 1998. Minryoku CD-ROM. Tokyo: Asahi-Shinbun-Sha.
3. Bell M, Blake M, Boyle P, Duke-Williams O, Rees P, Stillwell J, Hugo G. 2002. Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 165: 435-464.
4. Boyle P, Halfacree K. (eds) 1998. Migration into Rural Areas: Theories and Issues. John Wiley: Chichester.
5. Champion T. 1998. Studying counterurbanisation and the rural population turnaround. In Migration into Rural Areas: Theories and Issues, Boyle P, Halfacree K (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 21-40.
6. Champion T, Wong C, Rooke A, Dorling D, Coombes M, Brunsdon C. 1996. The Population of Britain in the 1990s: A Social and Economic Atlas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Champion T, Fotheringham AS, Rees P, Boyle P, Stillwell J. 1998. The Determinants of Migration Flows in England: A Review of Existing Data and Evidence. Report published by the Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions.
8. Cochrane SG, Vining DA. 1988. Recent trends in migration between core and peripheral regions in developed and advanced developing countries. International Regional Science Review 11: 215-243.
9. Curtis A, Fotheringham AS. 1995. Large scale information surfaces: an analysis of city name recalls in the United States. Geoforum 26: 65-78.
10. Flowerdew R, Aitkin M. 1982. A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. Journal of Regional Science 22: 191-202.
11. Fotheringham AS. 1983. A new set of spatial interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A 15: 15-36.
12. Fotheringham AS. 1986. Further discussion on distance-deterrence parameters and the competing destinations model. Environment and Planning A 18: 553-556.
13. Fotheringham AS. 1991. Migration and spatial structure: the development of the competing destinations model. In Migration Models: Macro and Micro Approaches, Stillwell J, Congdon P (eds). Belhaven: London; 57-72.
14. Fotheringham AS, O'Kelly ME. 1989. Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. Kluwer Academic: London.
15. Fotheringham AS, Curtis A. 1992. Encoding spatial information: the evidence for hierarchical processing. In Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag: Dortmund; 269-287.
16. Fotheringham AS, Champion T, Wymer C, Coombes M. 2000. Measuring destination attractivity: a migration example. International Journal of Population Geography 6: 391-421.
17. Fotheringham AS, Nakaya T, Yano K, Openshaw S, Ishikawa Y. 2001. Hierarchical destination choice and spatial interaction modelling: a simulation experiment. Environment and Planning A 33: 901-920.
18. Fotheringham AS, Barmby T, Brunsdon C, Champion T, Charlton M, Kalogirou S, Tremayne A, Rees P, Eyre H, Macgill J, Stillwell J, Bramley G, Hollis J. 2002. Development of a Migration Model: Analytical and Practical Enhancements. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
19. Frey WH. 1988. Migration and metropolitan decline in developed countries: a comparative study. Population and Development Review 14: 595-628.
20. Haynes KE, Fotheringham AS. 1984. Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models. Sage: Beverly Hills.
21. Ishikawa Y. 1987. An empirical study of the competing destinations model using Japanese Interaction Data. Environment and Planning A 19: 1359-1373.
22. Ishikawa Y. 1989. Explorations into the two-stage destination choice. Geographical Review of Japan 62B: 75-85.
23. Ishikawa Y, Fielding AJ. 1998. Explaining the recent migration trends of the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Environment and Planning A 30: 1797-1814.
24. Isoda Y. 1997. Migration research during economic and social fluctuations: a review of British internal migration. Quarterly Journal of Geography 49: 262-285.
25. Isoda Y. 2000. When do people live and where are they going: net migration by age in Great Britain. Journal of Population Studies 26: 35-44.
26. Kau JB, Sirmans CF. 1979. A recursive model of the spatial allocation of migrants. Journal of Regional Science 19: 47-56.
27. Liaw KL, Otomo A. 1991. Interprectural migration patterns of young adults in Japan: An explanation using a nested logit model. Jinkogaku-Kenkyu (Journal of Population Studies) 14: 1-20.
28. Long L, Tucker CJ, Urton WL. 1988. Migration distances: an international comparison. Demography 25: 633-640.
29. Nakaya T. 2001. Local spatial interaction modelling based on the geographically weighted regression approach. Geo Journal 53: 347-358.
30. Pellegrini PA, Fotheringham AS. 2002. Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context. Progress in Human Geography 26: 487-510.
31. Plane DA, Rogerson P, Rosen A. 1984. The cross-regional variation of in-migration and out-migration. Geographical Analysis 16: 162-175.
32. Rees PH, Kupiszewski M. 1999. Internal migration: what data are available in Europe? Journal of Official Statistics 15: 551-586.
33. Rees PH, Stillwell JCH, Convey A, Kupiszewski M. (eds) 1996. Population Migration in the European Union. John Wiley: Chichester.
34. Rees P, Fotheringham AS, Champion T. 2003. Modelling migration for policy analysis. In Applied GIS and Spatial Analysis, Clarke G, Stillwell J (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 259-296.
35. Rogers A, Willekens F. 1986. Migration and Settlement: A Multiregional Comparative Study. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
36. Roy JR. 1990. Spatial interaction modelling: some interpretations and challenges. Environment and Planning A 22: 712-716.
37. Stillwell J. 1978. Interzonal migration: some historical tests of spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A 10: 1187-1200.
38. Stillwell J. 1991. Spatial interaction models and the propensity to migrate over distance. In Migration Models: Macro and Micro Approaches, Stillwell J, Congdon P (eds). Belhaven Press: London; 34-56.
39. Stillwell J, Rees P, Duke-Williams O. 1996. Migration between NUTS level 2 regions in the United Kingdom. In Population Migration in the European Union, Rees P, Stillwell J, Convey A, Kupiszewski M (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 275-307.
40. Yano K, Nakaya T, Ishikawa Y. 2000 An analysis of inter-municipal migration flows in Japan using GIS and spatial interaction modeling. Geographical Review of Japan 73B: 165-177.