Multidisciplinary cross-national studies: A commentary on issues of collaboration, methodology, analysis, and publication

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 924-932

  Treloar, Carla ^a   Graham, Ian D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Methodological comment; Multicenter; Multidisciplinary; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; FUNDING; HEALTH PROGRAM; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COOPERATION; ETHICS; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBESITY; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ETHICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MULTICENTER STUDIES; OBESITY; PUBLICATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH;

EID: 0142092634     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732303253518     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., et al. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(8), 637-639.
2. Connor, L., Treloar, C., & Higginbotham, N. (2001). How to perform transdisciplinary research: Qualitative study designs and methods. In N. Higginbotham, G. Albrecht, & L. Connor (Eds.), Health social science: A transdisciplinary and complexity perspective. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
3. Fergusson, D., Blair, A., Henry, D., Hishishage, A., Huet, C., Koopman-van Gemert, A., et al. (1999). Technologies to minimise blood transfusion in cardiac and orthopedic surgery: Results of a practice variation survey in ten countries. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15, 717-728.
4. Graham, I. D., Alvarez, G., Tetroe, J. M., McAuley, L., & Laupacis, A. (2002). Factors influencing the uptake of technologies to minimize allogeneic transfusion: The perspective of eight Ontario hospitals. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 45(2), 132-140.
5. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315(711), 740-743.
6. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. London: Sage.
7. Oyen, E. (1990). The imperfection of comparison. In E. Oyen (Ed.), Comparative methodology: Theory and practice in international research. London: Sage.
8. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
9. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114-116.
10. Treloar, C., Graham, I. D., Hewitson, P., Harris, G., Henderson, K., Alvarez, G., et al. (2001). An international comparison of technologies to minimise allogeneic transfusion. Unpublished manuscript.
11. Treloar, C., Hewitson, P., Henderson, K., Harris, G., Henry, D., & McGrath, K. (2001). Influences on uptake of alternative transfusion techniques: An interview study of national and institutional stakeholders. Internal Medicine Journal, 31, 230-236.
12. Treloar, C. J., Porteous, J., Hassan, F., Kasniyah, N., Lakshmanudu, M., Sama, M., et al. (1999). The cross cultural context of obesity: INCLEN multicentre collaborative study. Health and Place, 5(4), 279-286.
13. Winett, R., King, A., & Altman, D. (1989). Health psychology and public health: An integrative approach. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.