The Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) project: Establishing a database to study trends in pediatric economic evaluation

Medical Care

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1142-1152

  Ungar, Wendy J ^a,b   Santos, Maria T ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Pediatrics; Publication database

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COST; DATA BASE; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ASPECTS OF DISEASE; HUMAN; INFANT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEDIATRICS; PREGNANCY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PUBLICATION; STATISTICS;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DATABASES; DISEASE; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; ONTARIO; PEDIATRICS; PREGNANCY; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 0142088629     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000088451.56688.65     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Drummond M. Evaluation of health technology: economic issues for health policy and policy issues for economic appraisal. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:1593-1600.
2. Power EJ, Eisenberg JM. Are we ready to use cost-effectiveness analysis in health care decision making? A health services research challenge for clinicians, patients, health care systems, and public policy. Med Care 1998;36(5 suppl):MS10-MS17.
3. Detsky AS. Using cost-effectiveness analysis for formulary decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics 1994;6:281-288.
4. Hurst J. The impact of health economics on health policy in England, and the impact of health policy on health economics, 1972-1997. Health Econ 1998;7(suppl 1):S47-S61.
5. Torrance G, Blaker D, Detsky A, et al. Canadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Pharmacoeconomics 1996;9:535-559.
6. Jacobs J, Bachynsky J, Baladi J. A comparative review of pharmacoecomomic guidelines. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;8:182-189.
7. Jameson EJ, Wehr E. Drafting national health reform legislation to protect the health interests of children. Stanford Law Policy Review Fall 1993:152-176.
8. Starfield B, Newacheck P. Children's health status, health risks and use of health services. In: Schlesinger MJ, Eisenberg L, eds. Children in a Changing Health System: Assessments and Proposals for Reform. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
9. Perrin JM. Introduction. In: Hobbs N, Perrin MJ, eds. Issues in the Care of Children With Chronic Illness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers Inc, 1985.
10. Bronfenbrenner U, Moen P, Garbarino J. Families and communities. In: Parke HR, ed. Review of Child Development Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
11. Halfon N, Newacheck PW. Characterizing the social impact of asthma in children. In: Weiss KB, Buist AS, Sullivan SD, eds. Asthma's Impact on Society, the Social and Economic Burden. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 2000.
12. Forrest CB, Simpson L, Clancy C. Child health services research, challenges and opportunities. JAMA 1997;277:1787-1793.
13. Gaus CR. Child Health Services: Building a Research Agenda: report to the Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR publication No. 97-R055, April 1997.
14. Warner KE, Hutton RC. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care: growth and composition of the literature. Med Care 1980;18:1069-1084.
15. Elixhauser A, Luce BR, Taylor WR, et al. Health care CBA/CEA: an update on the growth and composition of the literature. Med Care 1993;31(7 suppl):JS1-JS11,JS18-JS149.
16. Elixhauser A, Halpem M, Schmier J, et al. Health care CBA and CEA from 1991 to 1996; an updated bibliography. Med Care 1998;36(5 suppl):MS1-MS147.
17. Friede A, Taylor WR, Nadelman L. On-line access to a cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis bibliography via CDC WONDER. Med Care 1993;31(7 suppl):JS12-JS17. http://wonder.cdc.gov/DataSets.html
18. NHS economic evaluation database (NHS EED). York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. 2002. Available at: http://agatha.york.ac.uk/nhsdhp.htm. Accessed August 4, 2000.
19. Database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2002. Available at: http://agatha.york.ac.uk/darehp.htm. Accessed August 4, 2000.
20. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database. York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Available at: http://agatha.york.ac.uk/htahp.htm. Accessed Aug 4, 2000.
21. The Cochrane Library. Oxford, UK: Update Software. Available at: http://www.update-software.com/Cochrane/default.HTM. Accessed August 28, 2000.
22. Office of Health Economics, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Associations. Health economic evaluations database. London: OHE-IFPMA Database Ltd., 2002. Available at: http://www.ohe-heed.com/internet. htm. Accessed August 28, 2000.
23. Ungar WJ, Santos M. The Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) Project. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment Technology Report, August 2002.
24. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, et al., eds. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs, 2nd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1997.
25. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, 5th ed. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation, 1998.
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
27. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543-549.