From biological models to the evolution of robot control systems

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 361, Issue 1811, 2003, Pages 2145-2164

  Bullinaria, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biology; Control systems; Evolution; Modelling; Robots

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142086475     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2003.1249     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baldwin, J. M. 1896 A new factor in evolution. Am. Naturalist 30, 441-451.
2. Belew, R. K. & Mitchell, M. (eds) 1996 Adaptive individuals in evolving populations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bullinaria, J. A. 2001a Exploring the Baldwin effect in evolving adaptable control systems. In Connectionist models of learning, development and evolution (ed. R. F. French & J. P. Sougne), pp. 231-242. Springer.
4. Bullinaria, J. A. 2001b Evolving variable plasticity in neural systems. In Advances in fuzzy systems and evolutionary computation (ed. N. Mastorakis), pp. 236-241. Danvers, MA: WSES Press.
5. Bullinaria, J. A. & Riddell, P. M. 2000 Learning and evolution of control systems. Neural Netw. World 10, 535-544.
6. Bullinaria, J. A. & Riddell, P. M. 2001 Neural network control systems that learn to perform appropriately. Int. J. Neural Syst. 11, 79-88.
7. Bullinaria, J. A., Riddell, P. M. & Rushton, S. K. 1999 Neural network modelling of the linkages between accommodation and vergence. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, S362.
8. Eadie, A. S. & Carlin, P. J. 1995 Evolution of control system models of ocular accommodation, vergence and their interaction. Med. Biol. Engng Comput. 33, 517-524.
9. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. 1996 Rethinking innateness: a connectionist perspective on development. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fernald, R. D. 2000 Evolution of the eyes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 444-450.
11. Greenough, W. T., Black, J. E. & Wallace, C. S. 1987 Experience and brain development. Child Dev. 58, 539-559.
12. Hainline, L., Riddell, P., Grose-Fifer, J. & Abramov, I. 1992 Development of accommodation and vergence in infancy. Behav. Brain Res. 49, 33-50.
13. Hinton, G. E. & Nowlan, S. J. 1987 How learning can guide evolution. Complex Syst. 1, 495-502.
14. Horridge, G. A. 1987 The evolution of visual processing and the construction of seeing systems.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 230, 279-292.
15. Jacobs, R. A. 1988 Increased rates of convergence through learning rate adaptation. Neural Netw. 1, 295-307.
16. Julesz, B. & Kovacs, I. 1995 Maturational windows and adult cortical plasticity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Kolen, J. F. & Pollack, J. B. 1991 Back propagation is sensitive to initial conditions. Complex Syst. 4, 269-280.
18. Kotulak, J. C. & Morse, S. E. 1995 Oculomotor responses with aviator helmet-mounted displays and their relation to in-flight symptoms. Hum. Factors 37, 699-710.
19. Levine, W. S. 1996 The control handbook. London: CRC Press.
20. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. & Rushton, S. 1993 Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head mounted display. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 13, 387-391.
21. Morse, S. E. & Jiang, B. C. 2000 Oculomotor function after virtual reality use differentiates symptomatic from asymptomatic individuals. Optom. Vis. Sci. 76, 637-642.
22. Nolfi, S. & Floreano, D. 2000 Evolutionary robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Rushton, S. K. & Riddell, P. M. 1999 Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Appl. Ergon. 30, 69-78.
24. Schor, C. M., Alexander, J., Cormack, L. & Stevenson, S. 1992 Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 12, 307-318.
25. Sheehy, J. B. & Wilkinson, M. 1989 Depth perception after prolonged usage of night vision goggles. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 60, 573-579.
26. Syswerda, G. 1991 A study of reproduction in generational and steady-state genetic algorithms. In Foundations of genetic algorithms (ed. G. Rawlins), pp. 94-101. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Whitley, D. 1989 The GENITOR algorithm and selection pressure: why rank-based allocation of reproductive trials is best. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms (ed. J. D. Schaffer), pp. 116-123. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Yao, X. 1999 Evolving artificial neural networks. Proc. IEEE 87, 1423-1447.