Transforming Individuals into Groups: Some Hallmarks of the SDS Approach to Small Group Research

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 21-27

  Levine, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142082388     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2852     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1967). Mathematical models in social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-54). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
4. Davis, J. H. (1963). The preliminary analysis of emergent social structure in groups. Psychometrika, 28, 189-198.
5. Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
7. Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M. L. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 157-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Davis, J. H. (1982). Social interaction as a combinational process in group decision. In H. Brandstätter, J. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27-58). London: Academic Press.
9. Davis, J. H. (1996). Group decision making and quantitative judgments: A consensus model. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 35-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Davis, J. H., Hoppe, R. A., & Hornseth, J. P. (1968). Risk-taking: Task, response pattern, and grouping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 3, 124-142.
11. Davis, J. H., Hulbert, L., & Au, W. (1996). Procedural influence on group decision making: The case of straw polls - Observation and simulation. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 384-425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Davis, J. H., Hulbert, L., Au, W., Chen, X., & Zarnoth, P. (1997). Effects of group size and procedural influence on consensual judgments of quantity: The examples of damage awards and mock civil juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 703-718.
13. Davis, J. H., & Kerr, N. L. (1986). Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small group performance research. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 305-349). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Davis, J. H., & Restle, F. (1963). The analysis of problems and prediction of group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 103-116.
15. Davis, J. H., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Robertson, B. (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012.
16. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
18. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Issue importance and group decision making. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 68-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Kerr, N. L., Davis, J. H., Meek, D., & Rissman, A. K. (1975). Group position as a function of member attitudes: Choice shift effects from the perspective of social decision scheme theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 574-593.
20. Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 83-91.
21. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. L. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 61-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Laughlin, P. R., & Early, P. C. (1982). Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 273-280.
24. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
25. Laughlin, P. R., Kerr, N. L., Davis, J. H., Halff, H. M., & Marciniak, K. A. (1975). Group size, member ability, and social decision schemes on an intellective task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 522-535.
26. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. McGrath, J. E., & Altman, I. (1966). Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28. Nagao, D. H., & Davis, J. H. (1980). Some implications of temporal drift in social parameters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 479-496.
29. Restle, F., & Davis, J. H. (1962). Success and speed of problem solving by individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 69, 520-536.
30. Rosenberg, S. (1968). Mathematical models of social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 179-244). Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
31. Stasser, G., & Davis, J. H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551.
32. Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 279-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Stasson, M. F., Kameda, T., & Davis, J. H. (1997). A model of agenda influences on group decisions. Group Dynamics, 1, 316-323.
34. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
35. Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 189-239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.