Maintaining contact with drug users over an 18-month period

International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 261-265

  Harocopos, Alex ^a   Dennis, Dezlee ^b  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CPRU   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142072532     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000091860     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cottler L., Compton, W., Ben-Abdallah, A., Horne, M. and Claverie, D. (1996) Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 41, 209-217.
2. Desmond, D., Maddux, J., Johnson, T. and Confer, B. (1995) Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12, 95-102
3. Fletcher, B.,Tims, F. and Inciardi, J. (1993) Improving treatment: a program for systematic innovation. In J. Inciardi, F. Tims and B. Fletcher (eds) Innovative Approaches in the Treatment of Drug Abuse: Program Models and Strategies (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).
4. Fry, C. and Dwyer, R. (2001) For love or money? An exploratory study of why drug injectors participate in research. Addiction, 96, 1319-1325.
5. Gossop, M., Green, L. and Philips, G. (1989) Lapse, relapse and survival among opiate addicts after treatment: a prospective follow-up study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 348-353.
6. Harocopos, A., Dennis, D., Turnbull, P.J., Parsons, J. and Hough, M. (2003) On the Rocks: A Follow-up Study of Crack Users in London (London: South Bank University).
7. Marlatt, G. and Gordon, J. (1985) Relapse Prevention (NewYork: Guilford Press).
8. McKeganey, N. (2001) To pay or not to pay: respondents' motivation for participating in research. Addiction, 96, 1237-1238
9. Schensul, J., LeCompte, M., Trotter, R., Cromley, E. and Singer, M. (1999) Mapping Social Networks, Spatial Data and Hidden Population (London: AltaMira Press).