Mapping of 53 Loci in American Mink (Mustela vison)

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 386-391

  Kuznetsov, S B ^a,c   Matveeva, N M ^a   Murphy, W J ^b   O'Brien, S J ^b   Serov, O L ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CAT; CHINESE HAMSTER; CHROMOSOME MAP; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HYBRID CELL; MARKER GENE; MINK; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MUSTELA VISON; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALIA; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS GRISEUS; FELIS CATUS; MAMMALIA; MUSTELA; MUSTELA VISON;

EID: 0142063022     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esg084     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Christensen K, Brusgaard K, Malchenko S, Lohi O, and Serov O, 1996. Standardization of the American mink (Mustela vison) karyotype and some cosmid in situ hybridization results. Arch Zootec 45:259-265.
2. Cowmeadow MP and Ruddle FH, 1978. Computer-assisted statistical procedures for somatic gene assignment. Cytogenet Cell Genet 22:694-697.
3. Graphodatsky AS, Sharshov AA, Ternovsky DV, and Ternovskaya YG, 1989. Comparative cytogenetics of Mustelidae (Carnivorae) [in Russian]. Zool J 68:96-106.
4. Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, Perelman PL, O'Brien PC, Serdyukova NA, Milne BS, Biltueva LS, Fu B, Vorobieva NV, Kawakada SI, et al. 2002. Comparative molecular cytogenetic analysis in the order Carnivora: mapping chromosomal rearrangements onto the phylogenetic tree. Cytogenet Genome Res 96:137-145.
5. Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, Serdukova N, Perelman P, Zhdanova NS, and Ferguson-Smith MA, 2000. Dog chromosome-specific paints reveal evolutionary inter- and intrachromosomal rearrangements in the American mink and human. Cytogenet Cell Genet 90:275-278.
6. Hameister H, Klett C, Bruch J, Dixkens C, Vogel W, and Christensen K, 1997. Zoo-FISH analysis: the American mink (Mustela vison) closely resembles the cat karyotype. Chromosome Res 5:5-11.
7. Khlebodarova TM, Malchenko SN, Matveeva NM, Pack SD, Sokolova OV, Alabiev BY, Belousov ES, Peremyslov VV, Nayakshin AM, Brusgaard K, and Serov OL, 1995. Chromosomal and regional localization of the loci for IGKC, IGGC, ALDB, HOXB, GPT, and PRNP in the American mink (Mustela vison):comparison with human and mouse. Mamm Genome 6:705-709.
8. Lyons LA, Laughlin TF, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Womack JE, and O'Brien SJ, 1997. Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genomes. Nat Genet 15:47-56.
9. Mandahl N and Fredga K, 1975. Q, G, and C-band patterns of mink chromosomes. Hereditas 81:211-220.
10. Matveeva NM, Khlebodarova TM, Karasik GI, Rubtsov NB, Serov OL, Sverdlov ED, Broude NE, Modyanov NN, Monastyrskaya GS, and Ovchinnikov YuA, 1987. Chromosomal localization of the gene coding for alpha-subunit of Na+,K+-ATPase in the American mink (Mustela vison). FEBS Lett 217:42-44.
11. Murphy WJ, Shan S, Chen Z, Yuhki N, Hirshmann D, Menotti-Raymond M, and O'Brien SJ, 2000. A radiation hybrid map of the cat genome: implications for comparative mapping. Genome Res 10:691-702.
12. Murphy WJ, Stanyon R, and O'Brien SJ, 2001. Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping. Genome Biol 2:1-8.
13. O'Brien SJ, Menotti-Raymond M, Murphy WJ, Nash WG, Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Womack JE, and Graves JAM, 1999. The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science 286:458-481.
14. Pack SD, Bedanov VM, Sokolova OV, Zhdanova NS, Matveeva NM, and Serov OL, 1992. Characterization of a new hybrid mink-mouse clone panel: chromosomal and regional assignments of the GLO, ACY, NP, CKBB, ADH2, and ME1 in mink (Mustela vison). Mamm Genome 3:112-118.
15. Robinson R, 1975. The American mink (Muztela vizon Schreber). In: Handbook in genetics, vol. 6 (Robinson R, ed). New York: Plenum Press; 367-398.
16. Rubtsov NB, Radjabli SI, Gradov AA, and Serov OL, 1981. Chinese hamster-American mink somatic cell hybrids: characterization of a clone panel and assignment of the mink genes for malate dehydrogenase, NADP-1 and malate dehydrogenase, NAD-1. Theor Appl Genet 60:99-106.
17. Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier H-U, Lima-de-Faria A, and Fronicke L, 1994. Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat Genet 6:342-347.
18. Serov OL, 1998. The American mink gene map. ILAR J 39:189-194.
19. Serov OL, Gradov AA, Rubtsov NB, Zhdanova NS, Pack SD, Sukoyan MA, Mullakandov MR, and Zakijan SM, 1987. Genetic map of the American mink: gene conservation and organization of chromosomes. In: Isozymes: current topics in biological and medical research: genetics,development, and evolution, vol. 15 (Markert CL and Scandalios JG, eds). New York: Alan R. Liss; 179-215.
20. Wienberg J, Stanyon R, JauchA, and Cremer T, 1990. Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization. Genomics 8:347-350.
21. Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Nash WG, O'Brien PC, Yang F, O'Brien SJ, and Fergusson-Smith MA, 1997. Conservation of human vs. feline genome organization revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 77:211-217.
22. Wijnen LMM, Grzeshik KH, Pearson PL, and Meera Khan P, 1977. The human PGM-2 and its chromosome localization in man-mouse hybrids. Hum Genet 37:271-278.