Contribution of action to perception of self-orientation in humans

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 349, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 99-102

  Tremblay, Luc ^a   Elliott g, Digby ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dorsal ventral streams; Human perception; Morphological horizon; Perception action coupling; Visual vestibular illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EGO; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; KINESTHESIA; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0142058196     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00797-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aglioti S., Goodale M.A., DeSouza J.F.X. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5:1995;679-685.
2. Brandt U., Fluur E. Postural perceptions and eye displacements produced by a resultant vector acting in the median plane of the head. I. Response along three axes by stepwise increasing Φ with the subject heading centripetally in an erect and tilted position. Acta Otolaryngol. 63:1967;489-502.
3. Brandt U., Fluur E. Postural perceptions and eye displacements produced by a resultant vector acting in the median plane of the head. II. Continuous responses along the Y axis with the subject in a vertical position, heading centripetally and centrifugally. Acta Otolaryngol. 63:1967;546-578.
4. Cohen M.M., Larson C.A. Human spatial orientation in the pitch dimension. Percept. Psychophys. 16:1974;508-512.
5. Cohen M.M., Welch R.B. Visual-motor control in altered gravity. Proteau L., Elliott D. Vision and Motor Control. 1992;153-175 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
6. Daprati E., Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;1577-1582.
7. Ebenholtz S.M., Shebilske W. The doll reflex: ocular counterrolling with head-body tilt in the median plane. Vis. Res. 15:1975;713-717.
8. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5:2001;457-459.
9. Gielen S. Helmoltz: founder of the action-perception theory. Latash M.L., Zatsiorsky V.M. Classics in Movement Science. 2001;221-242 Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
10. Glover S. Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6:2002;288-292.
11. Glover S.R., Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and the control of reaching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;560-572.
12. Graybiel A. Oculogravic illusion. Arch. Ophthalmol. 48:1952;605-615.
13. Graybiel A., Brown R.H. The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge. J. Gen. Psychol. 45:1951;143-150.
14. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. Science. 21:1994;458.
15. Milner M.A., Goodale A.D. The Visual Brain in Action. 1995;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Roy J.E., Cullen K.E. Selective processing of vestibular reafference during self-generated head motion. J. Neurosci. 21:2001;2131-2142.
17. Schöne H. On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerosp. Med. 35:1964;764-772.
18. Stein J.F., Glickstein M. Role of the cerebellum in visual guidance of movement. Physiol. Rev. 72:1992;967-1017.
19. L. Tremblay, Dissociation of perception and action or contribution of action to perception? Young scientist award presentation at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.