Tomographic Quantum Cryptography: Equivalence of Quantum and Classical Key Distillation

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 9, 2003, Pages

  Bruß, Dagmar ^a   Christandl, Matthias ^b   Ekert, Artur ^b,c   Englert, Berthold Georg ^c   Kaszlikowski, Dagomir ^c   Macchiavello, Chiara ^d  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM THEORY; TOMOGRAPHY;

ENTANGLED PAIRS;

QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 0142057337     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.097901     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Y.C. Liang, D. Kaszlikowski, B.-G. Englert, L.C. Kwek, and C.H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
2. Pairwise complementary observables are ideal for this purpose, as shown by W.K. Wootters and B.D. Fields, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)APNYA6 191, 363 (1989), who give an explicit construction if (Formula presented) is a power of a prime.
3. B.-G. Englert and Y. Aharonov, Phys. Lett. A10.1016/S0375-9601(01)00271-7 284, 1 (2001);
4. P.K. Aravind, Z. Naturforsch.ZNTFA2 58a, 2212 (2003).
5. See, e.g., A. Chefles, Contemp. Phys.10.1080/00107510010002599 41, 401 (2000), and the pertinent references therein.
6. D. Bruß and C. Macchiavello, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127901 88, 127901 (2002).
7. A. Acín, N. Gisin, and V. Scarani, e-print quant-ph/0303009.
8. I. Csiszár and J. Körner, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 24, 339 (1978).
9. D. Deutsch et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 77, 2818 (1996).
10. M. Horodecki and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4206 59, 4206 (1999).
11. U.M. Maurer, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 39, 733 (1993).
12. For the qubit case of (Formula presented) the equivalence was shown by N. Gisin and S. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4200 83, 4200 (1999).