A segment-level hazard approach to studying household purchase timing decisions

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 49-59

  Vakratsas, Demetrios ^a   Bass, Frank M ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142055284     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.653     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allenby G. 1990. Hypothesis testing with scanner data: the advantage of Bayesian methods. Journal of Marketing Research 27: November, 379-389.
2. Allenby G, Lenk PJ. 1995. Reassessing brand loyalty, price sensitivity, and merchandising effects on consumer brand choice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(3): 281-289.
3. Allenby G, Leone RP, Jen L. 1999. A dynamic model of purchase timing with application to direct marketing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94(446): 365-374.
4. Becker GS. 1965. A theory of allocation of time. Economic Journal 75: September, 493-517.
5. Bell D, Chiang J, Padmannabhan V. 1999. The decomposition of promotional response: an empirical generalization Marketing Science 18(4): 504-526.
6. Bergstrom R, Edin P-A. 1992. Time aggregation and the distributional shape of unemployment duration. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7: 5-30.
7. Blattberg RC, Buesing T, Peacock P, Sen SK. 1978. Identifying the deal prone segment. Journal of Marketing Research 15(3): 369-377.
8. Blattberg RC, Neslin S. 1990. Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods and Strategies. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Bucklin RE, Gupta S. 1992. Brand choice, purchase incidence and segmentation: an integrated modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research 29(2): 201-215.
10. Chintagunta PK, Haldar S. 1998. Investigating purchase timing behavior in two related product categories. Journal of Marketing Research 35: February, 43-53.
11. Diamond P. 1987. Consumer differences and prices in a search model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: May, 429-436.
12. Gupta S, Chintagunta PK. 1994. On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research 31(1): 128-136.
13. Gupta S. 1988. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research 25(4): 342-355.
14. Jain DC, Vilcassim NJ. 1991. Investigating household purchase timing decisions: a conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Science 10(1): 1-23.
15. Jeuland AP, Bass FM, Wright GP. 1980. A multibrand stochastic model compounding heterogeneous Erlang timing and multinomial choice processes. Operations Research 28: March- April, 255-277.
16. Jeuland AP, Narasimhan C. 1985. Dealing-temporary price cuts-by seller as a buyer discrimination mechanism. Journal of Business 58(3): 295-308.
17. Kamakura WA, Russell GJ. 1989. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 26(4): 379-390.
18. Kim BD, Rossi PE. 1994. Purchase frequency, sample selection, and price sensitivity. Marketing Letters 5(1): 57-67.
19. Murthi BPS, Srinivasan K. 1999. Consumers' extent of evaluation in brand choice. Journal of Business 72(2): 229-256.
20. Narasimhan C. 1984. A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Science 3(2): 128-147.
21. Neslin SA, Henderson C, Quelch J. 1985. Consumer promotion and the acceleration of product purchases. Marketing Science 4(2): 147-165.
22. Ridder G. 1990. The non-parametric identification of generalized accelerated failure time models. Review of Economic Studies 57: 162-182.
23. Rossi P, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM. 1996. The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Science 15(4): 321-340.
24. Schmittlein DC, Cooper LG, Morrison DG. 1993. Truth in concentration in the land of (80/20) laws. Marketing Science 12(2): 167-183.
25. Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A. 1998. To zap or not to zap: a study of determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Science 17(2): 124-138.
26. Stacy EW. 1962. A generalization of the gamma distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33: 1187-1192.
27. The Economist. 1998. Market makers. 14 March, 67-68.
28. The Economist. 1999. Direct hit. 9 January, 57-59.
29. Vakratsas D. 1998. Consumer heterogeneity and the shape of purchase rate functions. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 14(1): 85-94.