Stereoscopic surface interpolation supports lightness constancy

Psychological Science

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 525-530

  Wilcox, Laurie M ^a,b   Duke, Philip A ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0142055254     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.03456     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adelson, E.H. (1993). Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. Science, 262, 2042-2044.
2. Anderson, B.L., Singh, M., & Fleming, R.W. (2002). The interpolation of object and surface structure. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 148-190.
3. Buckley, D., Frisby, J.P., & Freeman, J. (1994). Lightness perception can be affected by surface curvature from stereopsis. Perception, 23, 869-881.
4. Carman, G.J., & Welch, L. (1992). Three-dimensional illusory contours and surfaces. Nature, 360, 585-587.
5. Collett, T.S. (1985). Extrapolating and interpolating surfaces in depth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 224, 43-56.
6. Duke, P., & Wilcox, L. (2002). Lightness constancy and apparent slant in interpolated surfaces elicited by motion parallax and by binocular disparity [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2, 367.
7. Gilchrist, A.L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. Science, 195, 185-187.
8. Glennerster, A., McKee, S.P., & Birch, M.D. (2002), Evidence for surface-based processing of binocular disparity. Current Biology, 12, 825-828.
9. Grimson, W.E.L. (1982). A computational theory of visual surface interpolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 298, 395-427.
10. Hildreth, B.C., Ando, H., Anderson, R.A., & Treue, S. (1995). Recovering three-dimensional structure from motion with surface reconstruction. Vision Research, 35, 117-137.
11. Janssen, P., Vogels, R., & Orban, G.A. (2000a). Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science, 288, 2054.
12. Janssen, P., Vogels, R., & Orban, G.A. (2000b). Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron, 27, 385-397.
13. Julesz, B., & Frisby, J.P. (1975). Some new subjective contours in random-line stereograms. Perception, 4, 145-150.
14. Kingdom, F.A.A., Blakeslee, B., & McCourt, M.E. (1997). Brightness with and without perceived transparency: When does it make a difference? Perception, 26, 493-506.
15. Knill, D.C., & Kersten, D. (1991). Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception. Nature, 351, 228-230.
16. Koenderink, J.J., & van Doom, A.J. (1976). Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biological Cybernetics, 21, 29-35.
17. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
18. Marrara, M.T., & Moore, C.M. (2000). Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 62,786-799.
19. Mikaelian, S., & Qian, N. (2000). A physiologically-based explanation of disparity attraction and repulsion. Vision Research, 40, 2999-3016.
20. Mitchison, G.J., & McKee, S.P. (1985). Interpolation in stereoscopic matching. Nature, 315, 402-404.
21. Mitchison, G.J., & McKee, S.P. (1987). The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation. Vision Research, 27, 285-294.
22. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
23. Qiu, F., Endo, K., & von der Heydt, R. (2001). Neural representation of 3-dimensional shape primitives in monkey visual cortex [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 1, 273.
24. Ramachandran, V.S., & Cavanagh, P. (1985). Subjective contours capture stereopsis. Nature, 317, 527-530.
25. Todorovic, D. (1997), Lightness and junctions. Perception, 26, 379-395.
26. Vreven, D., & Welch, L. (2001). The absence of depth constancy in contour stereograms. Perception, 30, 693-705.
27. Westheimer, G. (1986). Spatial interaction in the domain of disparity signals in human stereoscopic vision. Journal of Physiology-London, 370, 619-629.
28. White, B. (1962). Stimulus conditions affecting a recently discovered stereoscopic effect. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 411-420.
29. Wurger, S.M., & Landy, M.S. (1989). Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues. Perception, 18, 39-54.
30. Yang, Y., & Blake, R. (1995). On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation. Vision Research, 35, 949-960.