A causal model of rehabilitation resource use for subjects with spinal cord injury in Taiwan

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 208-212

  Chung, Lyinn ^a   Pan, Ay Woan ^b   Wang, Yen Ho ^b  

^a YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Length of stay; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Well being

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENDER; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL; PREDICTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TAIWAN; VALIDATION PROCESS; WELLBEING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATABASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTERS; SEX FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TAIWAN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0142031001     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16501970310001583     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 1973; 51: 95-121.
2. Andersen R, Kravits J, Andersen OW. Equity in Health Services: Empirical Analyses in Social Policy. Cambridge MA: Ballinger; 1975.
3. Andersen R, Aday L. Access to medical care in the US: Realized and potential. Med Care 1978; 16: 533-546.
4. Dutton DB. Explaining the low uses of health services by the poor: Costs, attitudes, or delivery systems? Am Sociol Rev 1978; 43: 348-368.
5. Dutton D. Patterns of ambulatory health care in five different delivery systems. Med Care 1979; 17: 221-241.
6. Clark F, Azen SP, Zemke R, Jackson J, Carlson M, Mandel D, et al. Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 1321-1325.
7. Crewe NM, Dijkers M. Functional assessment. In: Cushman LA, Scherer MJ, eds. Psychological Assessment in Medical Rehabilitation. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1994: 101-140.
8. Stineman MG, Williams SV. Predicting inpatient rehabilitation length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 881-887.
9. Post MWM, Witte LPD, VanAsbeck FWA, Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJP. Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 78: 395-402.
10. Hampton NZ, Marshall A. Culture, gender, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction: A comparison between American and Chinese people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil 2000; 66: 21-28.
11. Chase BW, Cornille TA, English RW. Life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injuries. J Rehabil 2000; 66: 14-20.
12. Harada ND, Sofaer S, Kominski G. Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation: Implications for prospective payment. Med Care 1993; 31: 345-357.
13. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Predication of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 133-143.
14. Hosek S, Kane R, Carney M. Charges and Outcomes for Rehabilitative Care: Implications for the Prospective Payment System. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation; 1986.
15. Rondinelli RD, Murphy JR, Wilson DH, Miller CC. Predictors of functional outcome and resources utilization in inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 447-453.
16. McGinnis GE, Osberg JS, Dejong G, Seward ML, Branch LG. Predicting charges for inpatient medical rehabilitation using severity, diagnostic related groups, age, and function. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 826-829.
17. Rondinelli RD, Murphy JR, Wilson DH, Miller CC. Predictors of functional outcome and resources utilization in inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 447-453.
18. SM), Version 4.0. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1995.
19. Formations in health care Inc. The LORS American Data System (LADS): The National Inpatient Rehabilitation Program Evaluation System. Chicago Ill: Formations in Health Care Inc.; 1992.
20. Pan AW, Chung L, Huang Y, Chern J. The development of Taiwanese rehabilitation database system. J Occup Ther Assoc R.O.C. 2000; 18: 47-58.
21. Pan AW, Chern J, Chung L, Lai J. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Taiwanese rehabilitation functional scale. Occup Ther Int 2001; 8: 168-183.
22. Pan AW, Chung L, Tseng MH. Development and validation of a rehabilitation functional scale. Formos J Med 2001; 5: 389-400.
23. Pan AW. Model of rehabilitation resource use - A new approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago; 1994.
24. LaPlante MP. The need for assistance in basic life activities. In: Thompson-Hoffman S, Storck IF., eds. Disability in the United States, New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1991: 73-106.
25. Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1297-1301.
26. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
27. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md Stat Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
28. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffee MW. Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914-919.
29. Bowling A. Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.
30. Back AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II Manual. San Antonio TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
31. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, Health Institute; 1993.
32. Van Den Bos GAM, Triemstra AHM. Quality of life as an instrument for need assessment and outcome assessment of health care in chronic patients. Qual Health Care 1999; 8: 247-252.
33. Research team for WHOQQOL-Chinese version. Manual of WHO Questionnaire on Quality of Life-Chinese Version. National Taiwan University, Department of Psychology, Taiwan, 1999.
34. Duncan OD. Path analysis: Sociological examples. Am J Sociol. 1996; 72: 1-16.
35. Wright S. Path coefficients and path regressions: Alternative or complementary concepts? Biometrics 1960; 16: 189-202.
36. Pedhazur EJ. Multiple Regression and Behavioral Science. Orlando FL: Harcourt Brace Co.; 1982.
37. Subhash S. Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1995.
38. SAS Institute Inc. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1990.
39. LISREL 8. User's Reference Guide, Version 8 Edition. Chicago IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.; 1996.
40. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Williams SV. A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994; 32: 366-379.