Mapping XML documents to relations in the presence of functional dependencies

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1275-1281

  Wang, Qing ^a   Zhou, Jun Mei ^b   Wu, Hong Wei ^a   Xiao, Jian Chang ^a   Zhou, Ao Ying ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZTE CORPORATION   (China)

Author keywords

Constraint; Mapping XML; Semantic; XML FD

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; OPTIMIZATION; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCIES; THIRD NORMAL FORM;

XML;

EID: 0142028788     PISSN: 10009825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bray T, Paoli J, Sperberg-McQueen CM. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0. W3C Recommendation, 1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
2. Boag S, et al. XQuery 1.0: An XML query language. W3C Working Draft, 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery.
3. Florescu D, Kossmann D. A performance evaluation of alternative mapping schemes for storing XML data in a relational database. Technical Report, No. 3684, INRIA, 1999.
4. Shanmugasundaram J, et al. Relational databases for querying XML documents: Limitations and opportunities. In: Atkinson MP, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. Edinburgh, Scotland: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999. 302-314
5. Buneman P, Davidson S, Fan W, Hara C, Tan W. Keys for XML. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. Hong Kong: ACM, 2001. 201-210.
6. Buneman P, Fan W, Simeon J, Weinstein S. Constraints for semistructured data and XML. SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data), 2001, 30(1): 47-54.
7. Fan W, Schwenzer P, Wu K. Keys with upward wildcards for XML. In: Mayr HC, et al., eds. Database and Expert Systems Applications, 12th International Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2113, Munich, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 657-667.
8. Fan W, Simeon J. Integrity constraints for XML. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACMSIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. Dallas, Texas: ACM, 2000. 23-34.
9. Lee ML, Ling TW, Low WL. Designing functional dependencies for XML. In: Jensen CS, et al., eds. Advances in Database Technology - EDBT 2002, 8th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2287, Prague, Czech Republic: Springer-Verlag, 2002. 124-141.
10. Thompson H, et al. XML schema. W3C Working Draft, 2001. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema.
11. Chen Y, Davidson S, Zheng Y. Constraint preserving XML storage in relations. Technical Report, MS-CIS-02-04, University of Pennsylvania, 2002.
12. Davidson S, Fan W, Hara C. Propagating XML keys to relations. Technical Report, MS-CIS-01-33, University of Pennsylvania, 2001.
13. Lee D, Chu WW. Constraints-preserving transformation from XML document type definition to relational schema. In: Laender AHF, et al., eds. Conceptual Modeling-ER 2000, 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1920, Salt Lake City, Utah: Springer-Verlag, 2000. 323-338.
14. Clark J, DeRose S. XML path language (XPath). W3C Working Draft, 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath.