Conditioning deficits of CaM-kinase transgenic Drosophila melanogaster in a new excitatory courtship assay

Journal of Neurogenetics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 91-102

  Broughton, Susan J ^a,d   Tully, Tim ^b   Greenspan, Ralph J ^a,c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Simons Center for Quantitative Biology   (United States)

^c NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calcium calmodulin dependent protein kinase II; Male specific behavior; Modified courtship; Transgenic disruption of CaM kinase II activity

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE (CALCIUM,CALMODULIN) II;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ASSAY; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURTSHIP; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXCITATORY COURTSHIP ASSAY; FEMALE; MALE; MALE SPECIFIC BEHAVIOR; MODIFIED COURTSHIP; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; ODOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; TRANSGENICS;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0142027316     PISSN: 01677063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01677060390228342     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Ackerman, S.L., & Siegel, R.W. (1986). Chemically reinforced conditioned courtship in Drosophila: Responses of wild-type and the dunce, amnesiac, and don giovanni mutants. J. Neurogenet. 3, 111-123.
2. Cowan, T.M., & Siegel, R.W. (1984). Mutational and pharmacological alterations of neuronal membrane function disrupt conditioning in Drosophila. J. Neurogenet. 1, 333-344.
3. Cowan, T.M., & Siegel, R.W. (1986). Drosophila mutations that alter ionic conduction disrupt acquisition and retention of a conditioned odor avoidance response. J. Neurogenetics 3, 187-201.
4. Gailey, D.A., Jackson, F.R., & Siegel, R.W. (1984). Conditioning mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect an experience-dependent behavioral modification in courting males. Genetics 106, 613-623.
5. Greenspan, R.J., & Ferveur, J.-F. (2000). Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 205-232.
6. Griffith, L.C., Verselis, L.M., Aitken, K.M. Kyriacou, C.P., Danho, W., & Greenspan, R.J. (1993). Inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in Drosophila disrupts behavioral plasticity. Neuron 10, 501-509.
7. Griffith, L.C., Wang, J., Zhong, Y., Wu, C.-F., & Greenspan, R.J. (1994). Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and potassium channel subunit eag similarly affect plasticity in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10044-1004.
8. Hammer, M., Braun, G., & Mauelshagen, J. (1994). Food-induced arousal and non-associative learning in honeybees: Dependence of sensitization on the application site and duration of food stimulus. Behav. Neural Biol. 62, 210-223.
9. Hammer, M., & Menzel, R. (1995). Learning and memory in the honeybee. J. Neurosci. 15, 1617-1630.
10. Holliday, M., & Hirsch, J. (1986). Excitatory conditioning of individual Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Psychol. 12, 131-142.
11. Joiner, M.A., & Griffith, L.C. (1997). CaM kinase II and visual input modulate memory formation in the neuronal circuit controlling courtship conditioning. J. Neurosci. 17, 9384-9391.
12. Joiner, M.A., & Griffith, L.C. (1999). Mapping of the anatomical circuit of CaM kinase-dependent courtship conditioning in Drosophila. Learn. Mem. 6, 177-192.
13. Kupfermann, I. (1974) Feeding behavior in Aplysia: A simple system for the study of motivation. Bahav. Biol. 10, 1-26.
14. Lechner, H.A., Baker, D.A., & Byrne, J.H. (2000). Classical conditioning of feeding in Aplysia: I. Behavioral analysis. J. Neurosci. 20, 3369-3376.
15. McBride, S.M., Giuliani, G., Choi, C., Krause, P., Correale, D., Watson, K., Baker, G., & Siwicki, K.K. (1999). Mushroom body ablation impairs short-term memory and long-term memory of courtship conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron 24, 967-977.
16. Medioni, J., & Manning, A. (1988). Age related perserveration of the precopulatory behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia 44, 76-79.
17. Medioni, J. and Vaysse, G. (1975). Conditional Suppression of a reflex in Drosophila melanogaster: Acquisition and extinction. C.R. Séances Soc. Biol. Fel. 169, 1386-1391.
18. Nelson, M. (1971). Classical conditioning in the blowfly (Phormia regina): Associative and excitatory factors. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 77, 353-368.
19. Paillette, M., Ikeda, H., & Jallon, J.-M.(1991). A new acoustic signal of the fruit-flies Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Bioacoustics 3, 247-254.
20. Siegel, R.W., & Hall, J.C. (1979). Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 3430-3434.
21. Sokal, R.R., & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry, (3rd Ed.) New York: W.H. Freeman.
22. Tempel, B.L., Bonini, N., Dawson, D.R., & Quinn, W.G. (1983). Reward learning in normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 1482-1486.
23. Tully, T., & Hirsch, J. (1983). Two nonassociative components of the proboscis extension reflex in the blow fly, Phormia regina, which may affect measures of conditioning and of the Central Excitatory State. Behav. Neurosci. 97, 146-153.
24. Tully, T., & Quinn, W.G. (1985). Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. A 157, 263-277.
25. Tompkins, L., Siegel, R.W., Gailey, D.A., & Hall, J.C. (1983). Conditioned courtship in Drosophila and its mediation by association of chemical cues. Behav. Genet. 13, 565-578.