Quantum arrival times and operator normalization

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 221111-221117

  Hegerfeldt, Gerhard C ^a   Seidel, Dirk ^a   Muga, J Gonzalo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; FLUORESCENCE; LIGHT REFLECTION; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS;

KIJOWSKI'S DISTRIBUTION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0142025185     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J.G. Muga and C.R. Leavens, Phys. Rep. 338, 353 (2000).
2. Time in Quantum Mechanics, edited by J.G. Muga, R. Sala, and I.L. Egusquiza (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
3. G.R. Allcock, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 53, 253 (1969); 53, 286 (1969); 53, 311 (1969).
4. G.R. Allcock, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 53, 253 (1969); 53, 286 (1969); 53, 311 (1969).
5. G.R. Allcock, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 53, 253 (1969); 53, 286 (1969); 53, 311 (1969).
6. J. Kijowski, Rep. Math 6, 362 (1974).
7. R. Werner, J. Math. Phys. 27, 793 (1986).
8. N. Yamada and S. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 985 (1991); 86, 599 (1991); 87, 77 (1992).
9. N. Yamada and S. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 985 (1991); 86, 599 (1991); 87, 77 (1992).
10. N. Yamada and S. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 985 (1991); 86, 599 (1991); 87, 77 (1992).
11. B. Mielnik, Found. Phys. 24, 1113 (1994).
12. C.R. Leavens, Phys. Rev. A 58, 840 (1998).
13. P. Blanchard and A. Jadczyk, Helv. Phys. Acta 69, 613 (1996).
14. N. Grot, C. Rovelli, and R.S. Tate, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 (1996).
15. J.J. Halliwell, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 707 (1999).
16. J. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3218 (1999).
17. M. Toller, Phys. Rev. A 59, 960 (1999).
18. P. Kochański and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2689 (1999).
19. Y. Aharonov, J. Oppenheim, S. Popescu, B. Reznik, and W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4130 (1998).
20. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 122, 1649 (1961).
21. J. León, J. Julve, P. Pitanga, and F.J. de Urríes, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062101 (2000).
22. A.D. Baute, R.S. Mayato, J.P. Palao, J.G. Muga, and I.L. Egusquiza, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022118 (2000).
23. A.D. Baute, I.L. Egusquiza, and J.G. Muga, Phys. Rev. A 64, 014101 (2001).
24. A.D. Baute, I.L. Egusquiza, and J.G. Muga, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012501 (2001).
25. V. Delgado and J.G. Muga, Phys. Rev. A 56, 3425 (1997).
26. K. Aoki, A. Horikoshi, and E. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. 62, 022101 (2000).
27. E.A. Galapon, Proc. R. Soc. London 458, 451 (2002).
28. J.J. Wlodarz, Phys. Rev. A 65, 044103 (2002).
29. C.R. Leavens, Phys. Lett. A 303, 154 (2002).
30. I.L. Egusquiza, J.G. Muga, B. Navarro, and A. Ruschhaupt, Phys. Lett. A (to be published).
31. J.A. Damborenea, I.L. Egusquiza, G.C. Hegerfeldt, and J.G. Muga, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052104 (2002).
32. J.A. Damborenea, I.L. Egusquiza, G.C. Hegerfeldt, and J.G. Muga, e-print quant-ph/0302201.
33. R. Giannitrapani, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 1575 (1997).
34. R. Brunetti and K. Fredenhagen, Phys. Rev. A 66, 044101 (2002).
35. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
36. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
37. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
38. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
39. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
40. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Doebner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), p. 104; G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993); G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996). For a review, cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998). The quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992), and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
41. M.S. Kim, P.L. Knight, and K. Wodkiewicz, Opt. Commun. 62, 385 (1987).