Use of time - Subsidence data during pumping to characterize specific storage and hydraulic conductivity of semi-confining units

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 281, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 3-22

  Burbey, T J ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquifer compaction; Subsidence; Well hydraulics

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; DATA REDUCTION; DILATOMETERS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; INTERFEROMETRY;

SEMI-CONFINING UNITS;

HYDROLOGY;

ABSTRACTION; AQUIFER; DRAWDOWN; GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; SUBSIDENCE;

AQUIFER; DRAWDOWN; GRAPHICAL METHOD; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; SUBSIDENCE;

EID: 0142022679     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00197-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Amelung, F., Galloway, D.L., Bell, J.W., Zebker, H.A., Laczniak, R.J., 1999. Sensing the ups and downs of Las Vegas: InSAR reveals structural control of land subsidence and aquifer-system deformation. Geology 27 (6), 483-486.
2. Anderson, M.P., Woessner, W.W., 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 381 p.
3. Burbey, T.J., 2001. Stress-strain analyses for aquifer-system characterization. Ground Water 39 (1), 128-136.
4. Cooper, H.H., Jacob, C.E., 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluation formation constants and summarizing well-field history. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 27, 526-534.
5. Davies, P., Blewitt, G., 2000. Methodology for global geodetic time series estimation; a new tool for geodynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research B, Solid Earth and Planets 105 (5), 11083-11100.
6. Fielding, E.J., Blom, R.G., Goldstein, R.M., 1998. Rapid subsidence over oil fields mearured by SAR interferometry. Geophysical Research Letters 25 (17), 3215-3218.
7. Galloway, D.L., Hednut, K.W., Ingebritsen, S.E., Phillips, S.P., Peltzer, G., Rogez, F., Rosen, P.A., 1998. InSAR detection of system compaction and land subsidence, Antelope Valley, Mohave Desert, California. Water Resources Research 34, 2573-2585.
8. Hamilton, P.A., Larson, J.D., 1988. Hydrogeology and analysis of the ground-water flow system in the Coastal Plain of Southeastern Virginia. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 87-4240, 175.
9. Hantush, M.S., 1956. Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 37, 702-714.
10. Hantush, M.S., 1959. Analysis of data from pumping wells near a river. Journal of Geophysical Research 64 (11), 1921-1932.
11. Hantush, M.S., 1960. Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers. Journal of Geophysical Research 65 (11), 3713-3725.
12. Hantush, M.S., 1967. Flow to wells in aquifers separated by a semipervious layer. Journal of Geophysical Research 72 (6), 1709-1720.
13. Harmon, E.J., 2002. Extensometer data as an alternative means of determining aquifer specific storage, San Luis Valley, Colorado. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, October 26-31 34 (6) Abstract with programs, paper 99-10.
14. Harsh, J.F., Lacnziak, R.J., 1990. Conceptualization and analysis of the ground-water flow system in the Coastal Plain of Virginia and adjacent parts of Maryland and North Carolina. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1404-F, 100.
15. Helm, D.C., 1975. One-dimensional simulation of aquifer-system compaction near Pixley, California, 1. Constant parameters. Water Resources Research 11 (3), 465-478.
16. Hoffmann, J., Zebker, H.A., Galloway, D.L., Amelung, F., 2001. Seasonal subsidence and rebound in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada, observed by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Water Resources Research 37, 1551-1566.
17. Holdahl, S.R., Morrison, N.L., 1974. Regional investigations of vertical crustal movements in the US, using precise relevelings and mareograph data. Tectonophysics 23, 373-390.
18. Ikehara, M.E., 1994. Global positioning system surveying to monitor land subsidence in Sacramento Valley, California, USA. Hydrological Sciences 39 (5), 417-429.
19. Jacob, C.E., 1940. On the flow of water in elastic artesian aquifers. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 21, 574-586.
20. Jorgensen, D.G., 1980. Relationships between basic soils-engineering equations and basic ground-water flow equations. US Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2064, 40.
21. Leake, S.A., Prudic, D.E., 1991. Documentation of a computer program to simulate aquifer-system compaction using the modular finite-difference ground-water flow model. Tech of Water Resources Invest.US Geol Surv, Book 6, A2.
22. McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigation US Geological Survey, Book 6, Ch A1.
23. Meinzer, O.E., 1928. Compressibility and elasticity of artesian aquifers. Economic Geology 23, 263-291.
24. Meng, A.A., Harsh, J.F., 1988. Hydrogeologic framework of the Virginia Coastal Plain. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1404-C, 82.
25. Moench, A.F., 1985. Transient flow to a large-diameter well in a confined aquifer with storativity in semiconfining layers. Water Resources Research 21, 1121-1131.
26. Neuman, S.P., 1979. Perspective on "delayed yield". Water Resources Research 15, 899-908.
27. Neuman, S.P., Witherspoon, P.A., 1968. Theory of flow in aquicludes adjacent to slightly leaky aquifers. Water Resources Research 4, 103-112.
28. Neuman, S.P., Witherspoon, P.A., 1969. Transient flow of ground water to wells in multiple aquifer systems. Geotechnical Engineering Report 69-1, University of California Berkeley, CA, 182 p.
29. Neuman, S.P., Witherspoon, P.A., 1969b. Theory of flow in a confined two aquifer system. Water Resources Research 5, 803-816.
30. Neuman, S.P., Witherspoon, P.A., 1969c. Applicability of current theories of flow in leaky aquifers. Water Resources Research 5, 817-829.
31. Neuman, S.P., Witherspoon, P.A., 1972. Field determination of the hydraulic properties of leaky multiple aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 8, 1284-1298.
32. Poland, J.F., Davis, G.H., 1969, Land subsidence due to withdrawal of fluid. In: D.J. Varnes, G. Kiersch (Eds.), Reviews in Engineering Geology, v.2, Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America pp.187-269
33. Pope, J.P., 2002, Characterization and modeling of land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawals from the confined aquifers of the Virginia Coastal Plain. Unpublished MS Thesis, Virginia Tech, 149 p.
34. Pope, J.P., Burbey, T.J., 2003 (in press). Multi-aquifer characterization from single extensometer records Ground Water.
35. Riley, F.S., 1969. Analysis of borehole extensometer data from central California. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication 89, 423-431.
36. Sridharan, K., Ramaswamy, R., Lakshmana Rao, N.S., 1987. Identification of parameters in semiconfined aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 93, 163-173.
37. Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 16, 519-524.
38. Thom, C., Bock, O., Kasser, M., Fourmaintraux, D., 1995. Development of a new airborne laser subsidence measurement system, aiming at mm-accuracy. In: F.B.J., Barends, F.J.J., Brouwer, F.H., Schroder (Eds.), Land Subsidence, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 113-122.
39. Walton, W.C., 1970. Groundwater Resources Evaluation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 664 p.
40. Zebker, H.A., Rosen, P.A., Goldstein, R.M., Gabriel, A., Werner, C.L., 1994. On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: the Landers earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (B10), 19617- 19634.
41. Zebker, H.A., Rosen, P.A., Hensley, S., 1997. Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps. Journal of Geophysical Research 12 (B4), 7547-7563.