Collinear contextual suppression

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 27, 2003, Pages 2915-2925

  Herzog, Michael H ^a   Schmonsees, Ulrike ^a   Fahle, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0141997861     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuiness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 8:1985;407-430.
2. Bach M. The "Freiburg Visual Acuity Test". Automatic measurement of the visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science. 73:1996;49-53.
3. Breitmeyer B.G. Disinhibition in metacontrast masking of vernier acuity targets: sustained channels inhibit transient channels. Vision Research. 18:1978;1401-1405.
4. Brincat S.L., Westheimer G. Integration of foveal orientation signals: Distinct local and long-range spatial domains. Journal of Neurophysiology. 83:2000;1900-1911.
5. Cannon M.W., Fullenkamp S.C. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research. 31:1991;1985-1998.
6. Chubb C., Sperling G., Solomon J.A. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 86:1989;9631-9635.
7. Das A., Gilbert C.D. Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex. Nature. 399:1999;655-661.
8. Dresp B. Bright lines and edges facilitate the detection of small light targets. Spatial Vision. 7(3):1993;213-225.
9. Ejima Y., Takahashi S. Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings. Vision Research. 25:1985;1223-1232.
10. Field D.J., Hayes A., Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "Association Field" Vision Research. 33:1993;173-193.
11. Giersch A. A new pharmacological tool to investigate integration processes. Visual Cognition. 6:1999;267-297.
12. Giersch A. The effects of lorazepam on visual integration processes: How useful for neuroscientists? Visual Cognition. 8:2001;549-563.
13. Harrison S.J., Keeble D.R.T. Within-texture alignment improves human texture segmentation. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002.
14. Herzog M.H., Ernst U., Etzold A., Eurich C. Local interactions in neural networks explain global effects in Gestalt processing and masking. Neural Computation. 15:2003;2091-2113.
15. Herzog M.H., Fahle M. Effects of grouping in contextual modulation. Nature. 415:2002;433-436.
16. Herzog M.H., Fahle M., Koch C. Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through. Vision Research. 41:2001;2325-2335. Please read erratum: Vision Research, 42, 271.
17. Herzog M.H., Koch C. Seeing properties of an invisible element: Feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 98:2001;4271-4275.
18. Herzog M.H., Koch C., Fahle M. Switching binding states. Visual Cognition. 8(3-5):2001;623-636.
19. Herzog M.H., Schmonsees U., Fahle M. Timing of contextual interference in the shine-through effect. Vision Research. 43:2003;2039-2051.
20. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London). 148:1959;574-591.
21. Hupe J.M., James A.C., Girard P., Bullier J. Response modulation by static texture surround in area V1 of the macaque monkey do not depend on feedback connections from V2. Journal of Neurophysiology. 85(1):2000;146-163.
22. Kapadia M.K., Ito M., Gilbert C.D., Westheimer G. Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local contrast: parallel studies in human observers and in VI of alert monkeys. Neuron. 15:1995;843-856.
23. Kapadia M.K., Westheimer G., Gilbert C.D. Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. Journal of Neurophysiology. 84:2000;2048-2062.
24. Kaschube M., Wolf F., Geisel T., Loewel S. The prevalence of colinear contours in the real world. Neurocomputing. 38-40:2001;1335-1339.
25. Knierim J.J., van Essen D.C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 67:1992;961-980.
26. Krueger N. Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second-order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters. 8(2):1998;117-129.
27. Lamme V.A.F. The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 15:1995;1605-1615.
28. Li Z. Visual segmentation by contextual influences via intra-cortical interactions in the primary visual cortex. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 10:1999;187-212.
29. Li Z. Pre-attentive segmentation in the primary visual cortex. Spatial Vision. 13(1):2000;25-50.
30. Li W., Gilbert C.D. Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. Journal of Neurophysiology. 88:2002;2846-2856.
31. Li W., Thier P., Wehrhahn C. Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 83:2000;941-954.
32. Mareschal I., Sceniak M.P., Shapley R.M. Contextual influences on orientation discrimination: Binding local and global cues. Vision Research. 41:2001;1915-1930.
33. Marr D. Vision. 1982;Freeman, San Francisco.
34. Nothdurft H.-C., Gallant J.L., van Essen D.C. Response modulation ba texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of pop-out under anesthesia. Visual Neuroscience. 16:1999;15-34.
35. Olzak L.A., Laurinen P.I. Multiple gain control processes in contrast-contrast phenomena. Vision Research. 39(24):1999;3983-3987.
36. Polat U., Mizobe K., Pettet M.W., Kasamatsu T., Norcia A.M. Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature. 391:1998;580-584.
37. Polat U., Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research. 33:1993;993-999.
38. Popple A., Polat U., Bonneh Y. Collinear effects on 3-Gabor alignment as a function of spcaing, orientation and detectability. Spatial Vision. 14:2001;139-150.
39. Prodöhl C., Würtz R.P., von der Malsburg C. Learning the Gestalt rule of collinearity from object motion. Neural Computation. 15:2003;1865-1896.
40. Schmidt K.E., Goebel R., Loewel S., Singer W. The perceptual grouping criterion of collinearity is reflected by anisotropes of connections in the primary visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience. 9:1997;1083-1089.
41. Sengpiel F., Sen A., Blakemore C. Characteristics of surround inhibition in cat area 17. Experimental Brain Research. 116:1997;216-228.
42. Sigman M., Cecchi G.A., Gilbert C.D., Magnasco M.O. On a common circle: Natural scenes and Gestalt rules. PNAS. 98(4):2001;1935-1940.
43. Sillito A.M., Grieve K.L., Jones H.E., Cudeiro J., Davis J. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities. Nature. 378:1995;492-496.
44. Solomon J.A., Morgan M.J. Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks. Vision Research. 40:2000;279-286.
45. Solomon J.A., Watson A.B., Morgan M.J. Transducer model produces facilitation from opposite-sign flanks. Vision Research. 39:1999;987-992.
46. Taylor M.M., Creelman C.D. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 41:1967;782-787.
47. Toth L.J., Rao S.C., Kim D.S., Somers D., Sur M. Subthreshold facilitation and suppression in primary visual cortex revealed by intrinsic signal imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 3. 93(18):1996;9869-9874.
48. Tzvetanov T., Dresp B. Short- and long-range effects in line contrast integration. Vision Research. 42:2003;2493-2498.
49. Vidnyanszky Z., Papathomas T.V., Julesz B. Contextual modulation of orientation discrimination is independent of stimulus processing time. Vision Research. 41(22):2001;2813-2817.
50. Wehrhahn C., Dresp B. Detection facilitation by collinear stimuli in humans: Dependence on strength and sign of contrast. Vision Research. 38:1998;423-428.
51. Wehrhahn C., Li W., Westheimer G. Patterns that impair discrimination of orientation in human vision. Perception. 25:1996;1053-1064.
52. Weisstein N., Harris C.S. Visual detection of lines segments: An object-superiority effect. Science. 186:1974;752-755.
53. Westheimer G., Ley E.J. Spatial and temporal integration of signals in foveal line orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 77:1997;2677-2684.
54. Williams A., Weisstein N. Line segments are perceived better in a coherent context than alone: An object-line effect. Memory Cognition. 6:1978;85-90.
55. Xing J., Heeger D.J. Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research. 40:2000;3065-3072.
56. Xing J., Heeger D.J. Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement. Vision Research. 41(5):2001;571-583.
57. Zenger B., Sagi D. Isolating excitatory and inhibitory nonlinear spatial interactions involved in contrast detection. Vision Research. 36:1996;2497-2513.
58. Zenger-Landolt B., Koch C. Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination psychophysics and modeling. Vision Research. 41:2001;3663-3675.
59. Zipser K., Lamme V.A.F., Schiller P.H. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 16(22):1996;7376-7389.