Impaction grafting improves the fit of uncemented humeral arthroplasty

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 431-435

  Hacker, Scott A ^a   Boorman, Richard S ^a   Lippitt, Steven B ^b   Matsen III, Frederick A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMERUS; IMAGING SYSTEM; IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0141996569     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00053-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boileau P., Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implication for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79:1997;857-865.
2. Brewster N.T., Gillespie W.J., Howie C.R., et al. Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 81:1999;118-124.
3. Cofield R.H. Uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty. A review. Clin Orthop. 307:1994;86-93.
4. Eldridge J.D., Smith E.J., Hubble M.J., et al. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty. 12:1997;535-540.
5. Flugsrud G.B., Ovre S., Grogaard B., Nordsletten L. Cemented femoral impaction bone grafting for severe osteolysis in revision hip arthroplasty. Good results at 4-year follow-up of 10 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 120:2000;386-389.
6. Friedman R.J. Humeral technique in total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 29:1998;393-402.
7. Gie G.A., Linder L., Ling R.S., et al. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:1993;14-21.
8. Hastings D.E., Parker S.M. Protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop. 108:1975;76-83.
9. Masterson E.L., Duncan C.P. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 20:1997;821-822.
10. Maynou C., Petroff E., Mestdagh H., et al. Clinical and radiologic outcome of humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 65:1999;57-64.
11. McCollum D.E., Nunley J.A., Harrelson J.M. Bone-grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 62:1980;1065-1073.
12. NIH Image Home Page. National Institute of Mental Health Research Services Branch Web site. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/. Accessed January 13, 2002.
13. Norris B.L., Lachiewicz P.F. Modern cement technique and the survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 328:1996;76-85.
14. Robertson D.D., Yuan J., Bigliani L.U., et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus relevance to arthroplasty . J Bone Joint Surg Am. 82:2000;1594-1602.
15. Rockwood C.A., Matsen F.A., Wirth M.A., Harryman D.T. The shoulder. 2nd ed:1998;Saunders, Philadelphia.
16. Salvati E.A., Bullough P., Wilson P.D. Jr. Intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabular component following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 111:1975;212-227.
17. Simon J.P., Fowler J.L., Gie G.A. Impaction cancellous grafting of the femur in cemented total hip revision arthroplasty [abstract]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73-B:1991;573.
18. Slooff T.J., Huiskes R., van Horn J., Lemmens A.J. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand. 55:1984;593-596.