Introduction of computerized medical records. A survey of primary physicians

International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 153-160

  Urkin, Jacob ^a   Goldfarb, Dan ^a   Weintraub, Denis ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Computerized records; Israel; Patient physician relationship; Physician attitude

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ISRAEL; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL STAFF; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0141995744     PISSN: 03340139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IJAMH.2003.15.2.153     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale JF. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization and reasoning. J Am Med Infor Asso 2000;7:569-85.
2. Makoul G, Curry RH, Tang PC. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J Am Med Inform Ass 2001;8:610-5.
3. Fitter MJ, Cruickshank PJ. The computer in the consulting room: a psychological framework. Behav Inform Technol 1982,1:81-92.
4. Fitter M. Evaluation of computers in primary health care: the effect on doctor-patient communication. In: Peterson HE, Schneider W, eds. Human-computer communications in health care. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986.
5. Valenta Al, Wigger U. Early results of user profiles: physicians' opinions on the use of information technology. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996;65-69.
6. Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, Cohen N, Sharon A, Binztok M, Margolis CZ. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994;43(3-4):269-73.
7. Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. An Analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomedical Res 1981; 14:542-58.
8. Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fiskio J. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:400-4.
9. Young DW. What makes doctors use computers?: Discussion paper. J Royal Society Med 1984;77:663-7.
10. Brownbridge G, Evans A, Wall T. Effect of computer use in the consultation on the delivery of care. BMJ 1985;291:639-42.
11. Chessare JB, Torok KE. Implementation of COSTAR in an academic group practice of general pediatrics. MD Comput 1993;10:23-27.
12. Fischer PJ, Stratmann WC, Lundsgaarde HP, Steele DJ. User reaction to PROMIS: issues related to acceptability of medical innovations. Washington, DC: Proceedings 4th Ann Symposium computer applications in medical care, SCAMC 1980:1772-1730.
13. Rotman BL, Sullivan AN, McDonald TW, Brown BW & al. A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based physician workstation in an outpatient setting: implementation barriers to outcome evaluation. J Am Med Inform Ass 1996;3:358-9.
14. Folz-Murphy N, Partin M, Williams L, Harris CM, Lauer MS. Physician use of an ambulatory medical record system: matching from and function. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:260-4.
15. Colreavy p. Lack of adequate medical involvement in patient centered information technilogy. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000;77:213-8.
16. Hanken MA. Preparing physicians for computer-based patient record system. AHIMA 1992;63:95-100.
17. Dansky KH, Gamm LD, Vasey JJ, Barsukiewicz CK. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? J Healthc Manag 1999; 44:440-54.
18. Aydin CE, Forsythe DE. Implementing computers in ambulatory care; implications of physician practice patterns for system design. Proc AMIA Ann Fall Symp 1997:677-81.
19. Martin-Baranera M, Planas I, Palau J, Sanz G. IMASIS computer based medical record project: dealing with the human factor. Medinfo 1995;8(Pt 1): 333.
20. Brown SH, Coney RD. Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use. J Am Med Inform Ass 1994;1:381-94.
21. Gamm LD, Barsukiewicz CK, Dansky KH, & al. Pre- and post-control model research on end-users' satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results. Proc AMIA Symp 1998: 225-9.
22. Hammond KW, Prather RJ, Date VV, King CA. A provider-interactive medical record system can favorably influence costs and quality of medical care. Comput Biol Med 1990;20:267-79.
23. Anderson JG, Jay SJ, Schweer HM, Anderson MM. Why doctors don't use computers: some empirical findings. J Royal Society Med 1986;79:142-4.
24. Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G. The patient's view. BMJ 1984; 288:289-91.
25. Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient's view. Br J Gen Prac 1994;44:367-9.
26. Orenstein S, Bearden A. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records. J Fam Pract 1994;38:606-10.
27. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp 2000;275-9.
28. Aydin CE, Rosen PN, Jewell SM, Felitti VJ. Computers in the examining room: the patient's perspective. Proc Ann Symp Comp Appl Med Care 1995:824-8.
29. Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room? J Fam Pract 1995;41:241-4.