Bridging models across the software lifecycle

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 199-215

  Medvidovic, Nenad ^a   Grünbacher, Paul ^b   Egyed, Alexander ^c   Boehm, Barry W ^a  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^c Teknowledge Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Model connector; Refinement; Software architecture; Software design; Software model; Software requirements; Traceability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIFE CYCLE; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

BRIDGING MODELS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0141993720     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0164-1212(03)00063-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Abi-Antoun, M., Medvidovic, N., 1999. Enabling the refinement of a software architecture into a design, UML'99, October.
2. Anderson, K.M., 1999. Supporting software engineering with open hypermedia. In: ACM Computing Surveys' Electronic Symposium on Hypermedia, December.
3. Batory D., O'Malley S. The design and implementation of hierarchical software systems with reusable components. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 1992.
4. Bauer F.L., Moller B., Partsch H., Pepper P. Formal program construction by transformations - computer-aided, intuition-guided programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 15(2):1989.
5. Boehm B., Egyed A., Kwan J., Port D., Shah A., Madachy R. Using the WinWin spiral model: a case study. IEEE Computer. 7:1998;33-44.
6. Boehm B., Grünbacher P., Briggs B. Developing groupware for requirements negotiation: lessons learned. IEEE Software. 2001;46-55.
7. Booch G., Jacobson I., Rumbaugh J. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. 1998;Addison-Wesley.
8. Cheng B.H.C., Wang E.Y., Bourdeau R.H., Richter H.A. Bridging the gap between informal and formal approaches to software development. Software Engineering Research Forum. 1995.
9. Chung L., Gross D., Yu E. Architectural design to meet stakeholder requirements. Donohoe P. Software Architecture. 1999;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Dardenne, A., Fickas, S., van Lamsweerde, A., 1993. Goal-directed concept acquisition in requirement elicitation. In: 6th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design (IWSSD 6), October.
11. Egyed, A., 2000. Heterogeneous view integration and its automation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern California, August.
12. Egyed, A., Kruchten, P., 1999. Rose/architect: a tool to visualize architecture. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January.
13. Egyed, A., Medvidovic, N., 2000. A formal approach to heterogeneous software modeling. In: Conference on the Fundamental Aspects of Software Engineering, March.
14. Garlan, D., 1996. Style-based refinement for software architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW-2), San Francisco, CA, October, pp. 72-75.
15. Gieszl, L.R., 1992. Traceability for integration. In: 2nd International Conference on Systems Integration, pp. 220-228.
16. Gotel, O.C.Z., Finkelstein, C.W., 1994. An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In: First International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 94-101.
17. Gorlick, M.M., Razouk, R.R., 1991. Using weaves for software construction and analysis, ICSE 13, Austin, TX, May.
18. http://www.groupsystems.com/.
19. Grünbacher, P., Briggs, B., 2001. Surfacing tacit knowledge in requirements negotiation: experiences using EasyWinWin. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.
20. Kazman, R., Barbacci, M., Klein, M., Carriere, S.J., Woods, S.G., 1999. Experience with performing architecture tradeoff analysis, ICSE'99, Los Angeles, CA, May.
21. Khriss, I., Elkoutbi, M., Keller, R., 1998. Automating the synthesis of UML statechart diagrams from multiple collaboration diagrams, UML'98, June.
22. Koskimies K., Systa T., Tuomi J., Mannisto T. Automated support for modelling OO software. IEEE Software. 1998.
23. Liu, J., Traynor, O., Krieg-Bruckner, B., 1992. Knowledge-based transformational programming. In: Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering.
24. Mehta, N.R., Medvidovic, N., Phadke, S., 2000. Towards a taxonomy of software connectors, ICSE 2000, June.
25. Medvidovic, N., Rosenblum, D.S., Taylor, R.N., 1999. A language and environment for architecture-based software development and evolution, ICSE'99, May.
26. Medvidovic N., Rosenblum D.S., Redmiles D.F., Robbins J.E. Modeling software architectures in the unified modeling language. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 11(1):2002;2-57.
27. Medvidovic N., Taylor R.N. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 26(1):2000.
28. Moriconi M., Qian X., Riemenschneider R.A. Correct architecture refinement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 21(4):1995;356-372.
29. Mullery, G., 1979. CORE: A method for controlled requirements specification, ICSE 4, Munich, Germany, September.
30. Nuseibeh B., Kramer J., Finkelstein A. A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1994.
31. Partsch H., Steinbruggen R. Program transformation systems. ACM Computing Surveys. 15(3):1983.
32. Perry, D.E., 1998. Generic descriptions for product line architectures. In: 2nd International Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families (ARES II), Spain, February.
33. Perry D.E., Wolf A.L. Foundations for the study of software architectures. Software Engineering Notes. 1992.
34. Robertson S., Robertson J. Mastering the Requirements Process. 1999;Addison-Wesley.
35. Shaw, M., 1993. Procedure calls are the assembly language of software interconnection: connectors deserve first-class status. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Studies of Software Design.
36. Shaw M., Garlan D. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. 1996;Prentice Hall.