|
Volumn 106, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 87-93
|
Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) vs gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): Improvement in intravascular signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio;Gadobenato dimeglumina (Gd-DTPA) vs gadopentato dimeglumina (Gd-BOPTA) nell'angiografia con risonanza magnetica: Miglioramento dell'intensità di segnale intravascolare e del rapporto contrasto-rumore
|
Author keywords
Contrast agents; Contrast enhanced MRA; Corotid arteries
|
Indexed keywords
GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;
GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;
GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;
ARTICLE;
BOLUS INJECTION;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION;
FLOW RATE;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
IMAGE QUALITY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;
CAROTID STENOSIS;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
GADOLINIUM DTPA;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
MEGLUMINE;
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
|
EID: 0141989915
PISSN: 00338362
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (12)
|