MRI appearances of Müllerian duct abnormalities

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 747-754

  Scarsbrook, A F ^a   Moore, Niall R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b The John Radcliffe   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Congenital uterine anomalies; Infertility; Magnetic resonance imaging; M llerian duct abnormality

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILITY; FETUS; FETUS DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MUELLERIAN DUCT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROKITANSKY SYNDROME; TREATMENT INDICATION; UTERUS BICORNIS; UTERUS DIDELPHYS;

EID: 0141989590     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00212-5     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Moore KL, Persaud TVN. The urogenital system. In: Before we are Born; Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects, 5th edn Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998, 289-328.
2. Buttram VC. Müllerian anomalies and their management. Fertil Steril, 1983;40:159-163.
3. Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Congenital anomalies of the müllerian system. Fertil Steril, 1989;51:747-755.
4. Dähnert W. Obstetric and gynaecologic disorders. In: Radiology Review Manual, 4th edn Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999, 882-884.
5. Buttram V, Jr, Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril, 1979;32:40-46.
6. Hricak H, Chang YCF, Thurnher S. Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part 1. Normal anatomy and congenital anomalies. Radiology, 1988;169:169-174.
7. Togashi K, Nishimurja K, Itoh K, et al. Vaginal agenesis: classification by MR imaging. Radiology, 1987;162:675-677.
8. Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in Mayer- Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol, 1990; 76:593-596.
9. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin R, et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology, 1990;176:715-720.
10. Reinhold C, Hricak H, Forstner R, et al. Primary amenorrhea: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology, 1997;203:383-390.
11. O'Neill MJ, Yoder IC, Connolly SA, Mueller PR. Imaging evaluation and classification of developmental anomalies of the female reproductive system with an emphasis on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999;173:407-416.
12. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, et al. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology, 1992;183:795-800.
13. Li S, Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Hricak H. Association of renal agenesis and Müllerian duct anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2000;24: 829-834.
14. Fielding JR. MR imaging of Müllerian anomalies: impact on therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996;167:1491-1495.
15. Rock JA, Jones HW. The double uterus associated with an obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1980; 138:339-342.
16. Kaufman RH, Binder GL, Gray PM, Jr, Adam E. Upper genital tract changes associated with exposure in utero to DES. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1977;128:51-59.
17. Minto CL, Hollings N, Hall-Craggs M, Creighton S. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2001;108:791-797.
18. Wentz AC. Congenital anomalies and intersexuality, In: Jones HW III, et al. Novak's Textbook of Gynaecology, 11th edn Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1988, 140-181.