Principles and concepts for information and communication technology design

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 602-611

  Adams, Ray ^a   Langdon, Patrick ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION; THEORY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0141988833     PISSN: 0145482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0309701005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adams, R. G., & Berry, C. (1981). Cued recall of sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 295-307.
2. Adams, R., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, P. J. (2002). A systematic basis for developing cognitive assessment methods for assistive technology. In S. Keates, P. Langdon, P. J. Clarkson, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Universal access and assistive technology (pp 53-62). London: Springer.
3. Adams, R. G., & Whitney, G. (2003). Accessibility for all and tacit knowledge requirements of systems at work. Proceedings of the CEN/CENELEC/ETSI conference: "Accessibility for All: Making a World We Can All Share." Nice, France: Author.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1972). FRAN: A simulation model of free recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 51-59). New York: Academic Press.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
7. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Barnard, P. J., May, J., Duke, D., & Duce, D. (2000). Systems interactions and macrotheory. Transactions on Computer Human Interface, 7, 222-262.
9. Broadbent, D. E. (1984). The Maltese Cross: A new simplistic model of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 55-94.
10. Burns, A. (Ed.). (1984). New information technology. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.
11. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cooper, A. (1995). About face: The essentials of user interface design. New York: Hungry Minds.
13. Eysenck, M. W. (2001). Principles of cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
14. John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996). Using GOMS for interface design and evaluation: Which technique? Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery: ACM to CHI.
15. Keates, S., Harrison, L. J., Clarkson, P. J., & Robinson, P. (2000). Towards a practical inclusive design approach. In Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability, 2000 (pp. 45-52). New York: ACM Press.
16. Langdon, P., Adams, R., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). Universal access to assistive technology through client-centred cognitive assessment. In N. Carbonell, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access: Theoretical perspectives practice, and experience, Proceedings of the 7th ERCIM International Workshop on User Interfaces for All (pp. 555-567). New York: Springer.
17. Lee, F. J., & Anderson, J. (2001). Does learning a complex task have to be complex? A study in learning decomposition. Cognitive psychology, 42, 15-33.
18. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
19. Nielsen, J. (2001). Ten usability heuristics [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/ papers/heuristics
20. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human computer interaction. London: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Trace Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2003). Designing a more usable world-for all [Online]. Available: http://www.trace.uswisc. edu.