Incentives, Challenges, and Dilemmas of TANF: A Case Study

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 577-586

  Wolfe, Barbara L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141976810     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.10074     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Aaron, H.J. (1973). Why is welfare so hard to reform? Staff paper. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Cancian, M., Haveman, R., Meyer, D.R., & Wolfe, B. (2000). Before and after TANF: the economic well-being of women leaving welfare, Special Report 77, Institute for Research on Poverty. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
3. Laffer, A. (1984). The tightening grip of the poverty trap. Policy Analysis, 41 (August 30).
4. Mitchell, D.J. (2001). Lowering marginal tax rates: the key to pro-growth tax relief, Backgrounder No. 1443, May 22. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
5. Musgrave, R., & Musgrave, P. (1976). Public finance in theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Stohr, S.L., & Nyman, S. (2002). The Illinois child care experience since 1996: implications for federal and state policy. Chicago, IL: The Day Care Action Council of Illinois.
7. U.S. House of Representatives. (1998). Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means (Green Book). Washington, DC: Committee on Ways and Means.
8. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. (2001). Wisconsin works leavers survey: those who left W-2 cash assistance April 1998 through December 1998. Final Report. November. Available at: http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/desw2/pdf/leaversreport98.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2002.
9. Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau. (2001). An evaluation: Wisconsin shares child care subsidy program. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau.