|
Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 660-666
|
Biomechanical comparison between conventional and rapid expansion of skin
|
Author keywords
Biomechanics; Conventional expansion; Rapid expansion; Skin expansion
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
BIOMECHANICS;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOG;
EXPERIMENTATION;
FEMALE;
IMPLANT;
IN VITRO STUDY;
IN VIVO STUDY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
MATERIALS TESTING;
NONHUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SKIN EXPANSION;
SKIN FLAP;
SKIN SURFACE;
SKIN TENSION;
STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
ANIMAL;
ELASTICITY;
FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
METHODOLOGY;
TIME;
TISSUE EXPANSION;
ANIMALS;
DOGS;
ELASTICITY;
SKIN PHYSIOLOGY;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
TIME FACTORS;
TISSUE EXPANSION;
|
EID: 0141975225
PISSN: 00071226
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (36)
|
References (8)
|