Liners, bases, and cements in clinical dentistry: A review and update

Dentistry Today

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 88-93

  Weiner, Randy ^a,b,c  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Pierre Fauchard Academy   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; GLASS IONOMER; PHOSPHATE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC DERIVATIVE; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; DENTIN; DENTIST; DENTISTRY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENDODONTICS; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PULPITIS; REVIEW; TOOTH INFECTION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP; TOXICITY; VARNISH; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH DISEASE;

DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS;

EID: 0141974864     PISSN: 87502186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Reevaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125:823-831.
2. Weiner RS, Weiner LK, Kugel G. Teaching the uses of bases and liners: a survey of North American dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1640-1645.
3. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;91:817-825.
4. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:1-8.
5. Watts A, Paterson RC. Bacterial contamination as a factor influencing the toxicity of materials to the exposed dental pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;64:466-474.
6. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part I. Am J Dent. 2002;15:198-210.
7. Hilton TJ. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use. Oper Dent. 1996;21:134-146.
8. Meryon SD. The model cavity method incorporating dentine. Int Endod J. 1988;21:79-84.
9. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, et al. Cavity preparation devices: Effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2001;14:157-162.
10. Yang YK, Chan KC. Effect of varnishes on surface microhardness of basing materials. J Esthet Dent. 1991;3:103-105.
11. Baum L, Phillips RW, Lund MR. Textbook of Operative Dentistry. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995.
12. Draheim RN. Cavity bases, liners and varnishes: a clinical perspective. Am J Dent. 1988;1:63-66.
13. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1991.
14. Andrews JT, Hembree JH Jr. Marginal leakage of amalgam alloys with high content of copper: a laboratory study. Oper Dent. 1980;5:7-10.
15. Beltran-Aguilar ED, Goldstein JW, Lockwood SA. Fluoride varnishes. A review of their clinical use, cariostatic mechanism, efficacy and safety. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:589-596.
16. de Bruyn H, Arents J. Fluoride Varnishes - a review. J Boil Baccale. 1987;15:71-82.
17. Smith AJ, Garde C, Cassidy N, et al Solubilization of dentin extracellular matrix by calcium hydroxide [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1995;74: Abstract 829.
18. Schuurs AH, Gruythuysen RJ, Wesselink PR. Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000; 16:240-250.
19. Meeker HG, Najafi MM, Linke HA. Germicidal properties of dental cavity liners, bases, and cements. Gen Dent. 1986;34:474-478.
20. AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:135-141.
21. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, et al. Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1993;9:338-343.
22. Sidhu SK. Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:891-894.
23. do Nascimento AB, Fontana UF, Teixeira HM, et al. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth. Am J Dent. 2000;13:28-34.
24. Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glassionomer liners: microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996;21:67-70.
25. Donly K, Segura A, Kanellis M, et al. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:1459-1466.
26. Ugarte J, Lagravere M, Revoredo J, et al. Fluoride agent's uptake effect over 2 glass ionomer cements and a resin modified glass ionomer cement [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003; Vol. 82. Abstract 938.
27. Arweiler NB, Auschill TM, Reich E. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glassionomer cements? J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:289-295.
28. Irie M, Suzuki K. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glassionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 1999;24:272-278.
29. Gregoire GL, Akon BA, Millas A. Interfacial micromorphological differences in hybrid layer formation between water- and solvent-based dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:633-641.
30. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Costa CA. Human pulpal response to direct pulp capping with an adhesive system. Am J Dent. 2000;13:139-147.
31. Hagan K, Davis A, Belcher M, et al. Microleakage of class II restorations [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003; Vol. 82. Abstract 933.
32. Vettraino J, Neme A, Pink F, Yaman P. Effect of cavity treatment on in vitro amalgam leakage [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003; Vol. 82. Abstract 1322.
33. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:567-577.
34. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11:439-450.
35. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Composite restorations: Influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent. 2002;27:569-575.
36. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res. 1999;78:898-905.
37. Gordan V, Shen C, Mjor I. Marginal gap repair with flowable-composite - where is the weak? [abstract] J Dent Res. 2003; Vol. 82. Abstract 441.
38. Aksu M, Pokorny A, Neme A, et al. Effect on liner placement on microleakage in class Il resin composite restorations [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003; Vol. 82. Abstract 1271.
39. Berry CW, Miller BH, Miller AW, et al Antibacterial activity of dental cements [abstract]. J Dent Res. 1999; Vol. 78. Abstract 966.
40. Weiner RS. Liners, bases, and cements: A solid foundation. Gen Dent. 2002;50:442-446.
41. Hume W. The pharmacologic and toxicological properties of zinc oxide eugenol. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;113:789-791.
42. De C Luz MA, Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues MT, Garone Netto N, et al. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:634-639.
43. Ricketts D. Management of the deep carious lesion and the vital pulp dentine complex. Br Dent J. 2001;191:606-610.
44. Craig RG, Powers JM, eds. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2001.
45. Farah J. Temporary Cements. The Dental Advisor 1998; 15 (9):2.
46. Dilts WE, Miller RC, Miranda FJ, et al. The effect of zinc oxide eugenol on shear bond strengths of selected core/cement combinations. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:206-208.
47. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:211-215.
48. Leirskar J, Nordbo H. The effect of zinc oxide eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16:265-268.
49. Baudin G, Burgess J, Mercante D. Crown retention provided by 4 provisional cements [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003;Vol.82. Abstract 241.
50. Shimada Y, Kondo Y, Inokoshi S, et al. Demineralizing effect of dental cements on human dentin. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:267-273.
51. Mojon P, Kaltio R, Feduik D, et al. Short-term contamination of luting cements by water and saliva. Dent Mater. 1996;12:83-87.
52. Mitchell CA. Selection of materials for post cementation. Dent Update. 2000;27:350-354.
53. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH. Influence of composite inlay/onlay thickness on hardening of dual-cured resin cements. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66:147.
54. Hagge M, Wong R, Lindermuth J, et al. Five cements' post retention following canal obturation using ZOE sealer [abstract]. J Dent Res. 2003;Vol.82. Abstract 1277.
55. Gomes AP, Kubo CH, Santos RA, et al. The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents. Int Endod J. 2001;34:93-99.