Incorrect distance markings on an epidural catheter [7]

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 610-

  Goebel, A ^a   Ovenden, K ^a   Glynn, C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; CANNULATION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL CATHETER; EPIDURAL SPACE; HUMAN; LETTER; POSITION EFFECT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 0141962376     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg625     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. D'Angelo R, Berkebile BL, Gerancher JC. Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 88-93
2. Beilin Y, Bernstein HH, Zucker-Pinchoff B. The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 301-4
3. Hamilton CL, Riley ET, Cohen SE. Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 778-84