Economic implications of off-stream water developments to improve riparian grazing

Journal of Range Management

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 418-424

  Stillings, Amy M ^a,b   Tanaka, John A ^a   Rimbey, Neil R ^c   DelCurto, Timothy ^a   Momont, Patrick A ^c   Porath, Marni L ^a,c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b M J Bradley and Associates Inc   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; GRAZING; RANGELAND; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; WATER QUALITY;

BOS TAURUS; RIPARIA;

EID: 0141958884     PISSN: 0022409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4003831     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Armour, C.L., D.A. Duff, and W. Elmore. 1991. The effects of livestock grazing on riparian and stream ecosystems. Fisheries (16):7-11.
2. Burkhardt, J.W. 1997. Grazing utilization limits: an ineffective management tool. Rangelands 19(3).
3. Dickard, M.L. 1998. Management strategies for improved cattle distribution and subsequent riparian health. M.S. Thesis. Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, Ida.
4. Elmore, W. and R.L. Beschta. 1987. Riparian areas: perceptions in management. Rangelands 9(6):260-265.
5. Gill, P.E., W. Murray, B.A. Murtagh, M.A. Saunders, and M.H. Wright. 1992. GAMS/MINOS, Appendix D. In: A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus (eds.) GAMS: a user's guide, ed 2.25. The Scientific Press, San Francisco, Calif.
6. Hart, R.H., J.W. Waggoner, Jr., T.G. Dunn, C.C. Kaltenbach, and L.D. Adams. 1988. Optimal stocking rate for cow-calf enterprises on native range and complementary improved pastures. J. Range Manage. 41(5):435-441.
7. Kauffman, J.B. and W.C. Krueger. 1984. Livestock impacts on riparian ecosystems and streamside management implications. J. Range Manage. 37(5):430-437.
8. Nielsen, D.B. 1984. Economic factors to be considered in sagebrush/grassland management, pp. 1373-1386. In: Developing strategies for rangeland management: A report prepared by the Committee on Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management. Westview Press. Boulder, Colo.
9. Oregon State University. 1998. Stubble height and utilization measurements: uses and misuses. Ore. State Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 682.
10. Pope III, C.A. and G.L. McBryde. 1984. Optimal stocking of rangeland for livestock production within a dynamic framework. Western J. Agr.. Econ. 9(1)160-169.
11. SAS Institute, Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide, 6.12 ed. Cary, N.C.
12. Skovlin, J. 1984. Impacts on grazing on wetland and riparian habitat: a review of our knowledge, p. 1001-1103. In: Developing strategies for rangeland management. National Research Council. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
13. Sneva, F.A. and D.N. Hyder. 1962. Forecasting range herbage production in eastern Oregon. Ore. State Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 588, Corvallis, Ore.
14. Standiford, R.B. and R.E. Howitt. 1992. Solving empirical bioeconomic models: a rangeland management application. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 74(2):421-433.
15. Torell, L.A., K.S. Lyon, and E.B. Godfrey. 1991. Long-run versus short-run planning horizons and the rangeland stocking rate decision. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 73(3)795-807.
16. Turner, B., F. Obermiller, J. Tanaka, B. Eleveld, B. Broderick, G. Delaney, R. Mills, and J. Williams. 1998. Enterprise budget, 300 cow/calf, mountain region. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv. EM 8686.
17. U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI). 1996. Utilization studies and residual measurements. Bureau of Land Manage. BLM/RS/ST-96/004+1730.
18. Workman, J.P. 1986. Range Economics. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.