The effects of family, school, peers, and attitudes on adolescents' drug use: Do they vary with age?

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 97-126

  Jang, Sung Joon ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141954455     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820200095181     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agnew, R. (1991). A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 126-156.
2. Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach (3rd ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Humphrey, R. H. (1988). Explaining the recent decline in marijuana use: Differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 29, 92-112.
4. Bemdt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 608-616.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Chen, K, & Kandel, D. B. (1995). The natural history of drug use from adolescence to the mid- thirties in a general population sample. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 41-47.
7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression I correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Collins, R. L., Ellickson, P. L., & Bell, R. M. (1998). Simultaneous polydrug use among teens: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of Substance Abuse, 10, 233-253.
9. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers.” Developmental Psychology, 27, 172-180.
10. Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1996). A multivariate latent growth curve analysis of adolescent substance use. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 323-347.
11. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1994). The effects of family cohesiveness and peer encouragement on the development of adolescent alcohol use: A cohort- sequential approach to the analysis of longitudinal data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 588-599.
12. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use and mental health problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Esbensen, F.-A., & Elliott, D. S. (1994). Continuity and discontinuity in illicit drug use: Patterns and antecedents. Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 75-97.
15. Farnworth, M., Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., & Lizotte, A. J. (1994). Measurement in the study of class and delinquency: Integrating theory and research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 32-61.
16. Farrington, D. P. (1986). Stepping-stones to adult criminal careers. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior (pp. 359-384). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
17. Hawkins, J. D., Jenson, J. M., Catalano R. F., & Lishner, D. M. (1988, June). Delinquency and drug abuse: Implications for social services. Social Service Review, pp. 258-284.
18. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Jang, S. J. (1999a). Age-varying effects of family, school, and peers on delinquency: A multilevel modeling test of interactional theory. Criminology, 37, 643-685.
20. Jang, S. J. (1999b). Different definitions, different modeling decisions, and different interpretations: A rejoinder to Lauritsen. Criminology, 37, 695-702.
21. Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2001). Neighborhood disorder, individual religiosity, and adolescent use of illicit drugs: A test of multilevel hypotheses. Criminology, 39, 109-143.
22. Jang, S. J., & Krohn, M. D. (1995). Developmental patterns of sex differences in delinquency among African American adolescents: A test of the sex-invariance hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 195-222.
23. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychological development. New York: Academic Press.
24. Johnson, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2001). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescents drug use: Overview of key findings, 2000 (NIH Publication NO. 01-4923). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
25. Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug and drinking behavior among youth. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 235-285.
26. Kandel, D. B., & Logan, J. A. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood: I. Periods of risk for initiation, continued use, and discontinuation. American Journal of Public Health, 74, 660-666.
27. Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Thornberry, T. P., Smith, C., & McDowall, D. (1996). Reciprocal causal relationships among drug use, peers, and beliefs: A five-wave panel model. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 405-428.
28. Krosnick, J. A., & Judd, C. M. (1982). Transitions in social influence at adolescence: Who induces cigarette smoking? Developmental Psychology, 18, 359-368.
29. LaGrange, R. L., & White, H. R. (1985). Age differences in delinquency: A test of theory. Criminology, 23, 19-46.
30. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225-238.
31. Lauritsen, J. L. (1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 77, 127-155.
32. Lauritsen, J. L. (1999). Limitations in the use of longitudinal self-report data: A comment.” Criminology, 37, 687-694.
33. Loeber, R., & Le Blanc, M. (1990). Toward a developmental criminology. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 12 (pp. 375-473). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency.” In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.) Crime and justice: An annual review of research, Vol. 7 (pp. 29-149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Menard, S., & Huizinga, D. (1989). Age, period, and cohort size effects on self-reported alcohol, marijuana, and polydrug use: Results from the national youth survey. Social Science Research, 18, 174-194.
36. Moffitt, T. E. (1997). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent offending: A complementary pair of developmental theories. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 11-54). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
37. Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290-300.
38. Nagin, D. S., Farrington, D. P., & Moffitt, T. E. (1995). Life-course trajectories of different types of offenders. Criminology, 33, 111-139.
39. Paternoster, R. (1988). Examining three-wave deterrence models: A question of temporal order and specification. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79, 135-179.
40. Petersen, A. C., Silberreisen, R. K., & Sorensen, S. (1992). Adolescent development: A global perspective. In W. Meeus, M. de Goede, W. Kox, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Adolescence, careers, and cultures (pp. 3-34). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
41. Raudenbush, S. W., & Chan, W.-S. (1992). Growth curve analysis in accelerated longitudinal designs. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 387-411.
42. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Schulenberg, J., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Wadsworth, K. N., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Getting drunk and growing up: Trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 289-304.
44. Single, E., Kandel, D., & Faust, R. (1974). Patterns of multiple drug use in high school. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 344-357.
45. Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1987). An 8-year study of multiple influences on drug use and drug use consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1094-1105.
46. Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851.
47. Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Towards an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863-892.
48. Thornberry, T. P. (1996). Empirical support for interactional theory: A review of the literature. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories, (pp. 198-235). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (1997). Peers, drug use, and delinquency. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 218-233). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
50. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Famworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1991). Testing interactional theory: An examination of reciprocal causal relationships among family, school, and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 3-35.
51. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Famworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47-83.
52. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Summary of findings from the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse [On-line]. Available: http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/oasftp.htm