ESRD managed care demonstration: Financial implications

Health Care Financing Review

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 59-75

  Dykstra, Dawn M ^b   Beronja, Nancy ^a   Menges, Joel ^b   Gaylin, Daniel S ^b   Oppenheimer, Caitlin Carroll ^b   Shapiro, Jennifer R ^b   Wolfe, Robert A ^b   Rubin, Robert J ^b   Held, Philip J ^b  

^a LEWIN GROUP   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; DIALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INFANT; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MANAGED CARE; MEDICARE; PRESCRIPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CALIFORNIA; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMORBIDITY; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; FLORIDA; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES;

EID: 0141954065     PISSN: 01958631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berenson, R.: Medicare+Choice: Doubling or Disappearing? Health Affairs. Medicare Reform Web Exclusive, November 2001. http://www.healthaffairs.org/WebExclusives/Berenson_Web_Excl_112801.htm. (Accessed 2003.)
2. Brown, R.S., Clement, D.G., Hill, J.W., et al.: Do Health Maintenance Organizations Work for Medicare? Health Care Financing Review 15(1):7-24, Fall 1993.
3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Office of the Actuary Memorandum. Baltimore, MD. December 2001.
4. Duan, N.: Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78:605-610, 1983.
5. Hellinger, F.J.: Selection Bias in Health Maintenance Organizations: Analysis of Recent Evidence. Health Care Financing Review 9(2):55-63, Winter 1987.
6. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: The Faces of Medicare: Medicare and Low-Income Beneficiaries, 1999. Web site: http://www.kff.org. (Accessed 2003.)
7. The Lewin Group and the University Renal Research and Education Association: Final Report on the Evaluation of CMS' ESRD Managed Care Demonstration, June 2002.
8. National Institute for Health Care Management Research and Educational Foundation: Prescription Drug Expenditures in 2000: The Upward Trend Continues. National Institute for Health Career Management Research and Educational Foundation. Washington, DC. May 2001.
9. Office of Inspector General: Adequacy of Medicare's Managed Care Payments After the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Report A-14-00-00212. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC. September 2000.
10. Riley, G., Tudor, C., Chiang, Y.P., and Ingber, M.: Health Status of Medicare Enrollees in HMOs and Fee-for-Service in 1994. Health Care Financing Review 17(4):65-76, Summer 1996.
11. Schore, J., and Brown, R.: State Variation in Medicaid Pharmacy Benefit Use Among Dually-Eligible Beneficiaries. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Washington, DC. March 2002.
12. U.S. General Accounting Office: Medicare: Fewer and Lower Cost Beneficiaries with Chronic Conditions Enroll in HMOs. GAO/HEHS-97-160. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. August 1997. Web site: http://www.gao.gov/archieve (Accessed 2003.)
13. U.S. General Accounting Office: Medicare+Choice: Payments Exceed Cost of Benefits in Fee-for-Service, Adding Billions to Spending. GAO/HEHS-00-161. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC. August 2000. Web site: http://www.gao.gov/ archieve. (Accessed 2003.)
14. U.S. Renal Data System: USRDS 1996 Annual Data Report. National Institute of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Bethesda, MD. 1996.
15. Young, E.W., Goodkin, D.A., Mapes, D.L., et al.: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): An International Hemodialysis Study. Kidney International, 57 (Supplement 74):S74-S81, 2000.