Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments: Research trends

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 581-608

  Pinto, Maria ^a  

^a Department of Information Science ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Abstracting; Abstracts; Electronic document delivery; Qualify function deployment; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141942688     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00220410310499609     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allen, B.L (1998), "Visualization and cognitive abilities", in Attherton, P. and Johnson, E. (Eds), Visualizing Subject Access for 21st Century Information Resources, Faculty of Library and Information Science, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
2. Applegate, R. (1994), "Models of satisfaction", Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 60, pp. 199-227.
3. Belkin, NJ. (1990), "The cognitive viewpoint in information science", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 16, pp. 11-15.
4. Belkin, NJ. and Robertson, S.E. (1976), "Information science and the phenomenon of information", Journal of American Information Science, July/August, pp. 197-204.
5. Blair, D.C. (2002), "Knowledge management: hype, hope or help?", Journal of American Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 12, pp. 1019-28.
6. Boiko, B. (2002), Content Management Bible, Hungry Minds, New York, NY.
7. Brezillon, P. and Saker, I. (1999), "Modeling context in information seeking", in Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D.K. (Eds), Exploring the Context of Information Behaviour, Taylor Graham, London.
8. Brier, S. (1996), "Cybersemiotics: a new paradigm in analizing the problems of knowledge organization and document retrieval in information science", Proceedings of CoLIS 2, 2nd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, The Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen.
9. Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983), Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Burger, P. (1989), "Interpretation after Duchamp", in Meutsch, D. and Viehoff, R. (Eds), Comprehension of Literary Discourse, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
11. Chin, K.-S., Pun, K.-F., Leung, W. and Lau, H. (2001), "A quality function deployment approach for improving technical library and information services: a case study", Library Management, Vol. 22 No. 4/5, pp. 195-204.
12. Cohen, L. (1996), Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
13. Cooper, L. and Kuhlthau, C. (1999), "Imagery for constructing meaning in the information search process: a study of middle school students", in Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D.K. (Eds), Exploring the Context of Information Behaviour, Taylor Graham, London.
14. Cornelius, I. (1996), "Information and interpretation", Proceedings of CoLIS 2, 2nd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, The Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen.
15. Cremmins, E.T. (1992), "Value-added processing of representational and speculative information using cognitive skill", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 18, pp. 27-37.
16. Dowty, D.R., Wall, R.E. and Peters, S. (1989), Introduction to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
17. Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1998), Summarizing Information, Springer, Berlin.
18. Gaines, B. and Shaw, M. (1999), "WebMap: concept mapping on the Web", available at: www.w3.org/WWW4/Papers/134
19. Gilchrist, A. (1995), "Who is responsible for information quality in the information society?", in 5es Jornades Catalanes de Documentacio, Barcelona.
20. Goldfarb, C.F. (1990), The SGML Handbook, Rubinsky Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Hand, T. (1997), "A proposal for task-based evaluation of text summarization systems", Proceedings of ACL/EACLWorkshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pp. 31-9.
22. Hannabuss, S. (1995), "Approachs to research", Aslib Proceedings, Vol, 47 No. 1, pp. 3-11.
23. Hartley, J., Sydes, M. and Blurton, A. (1996), "Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient?", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 349-56.
24. Hernon, P. and Whitman, J. (2001), Delivering Satisfaction and Service Quality: A Customer-based Approach for Libraries, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
25. Hjörland, B. (1998), "Theory and meta-theory of information science: a new interpretation", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 606-21.
26. Hjörland, B. (2002), "Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 58 No, 4, pp. 422-62.
27. Hutchins, WJ. (1985), "Information retrieval and text analysis", in Van Dijk, T.A. (Ed.), Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication, Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY.
28. Hutchins, WJ. (1987), "Summarization: some problems and methods", Informatics 9: Meaning, the Frontier of Informatics, proceedings of a conference jointly sponsored by Aslib, Cambridge, pp. 151-73.
29. Kircz, J.G. (1998), "Modularity: the next form of scientific information presentation?", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 210-35.
30. Kostoff, R. and Hartley, J. (2002), "Open letter to technical journal editors regarding structured abstracts", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 257-61.
31. Lalmas, M. and Ruthven, I. (1998), "Representing and retrieving structured documents using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: modelling and evaluation", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 529-65.
32. Lancaster, F.W. (1998), Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Graduate School Library and Information Science, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
33. Liddy, E. (1991), "The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study", Information Processing & Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 55-81.
34. Luhn, H.P. (1958), "The automatic creation of literature abstract", IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 2, pp. 159-65.
35. Minsky, M.A. (1975), "Framework for representing knowledge", in Winston, P.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, Academic Press, New York, NY.
36. Mizzaro, S. (1996), "A cognitive analysis of information retrieval", Proceedings of CoLIS 2, 2nd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective, The Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen.
37. Moens, M.F. (2000), Automatic Indexing and Abstracting of Document Texts, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
38. Moens, M.F. and Dumortier, J. (2000), "Use a text grammar for generating highlight abstracts of magazine articles", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 520-39.
39. Nicholson, S. (1997), "Indexing and abstracting on the World Wide Web: an examination of six Web databases", Information Technology and Libraries, June, pp. 1-14.
40. Paice, C.D. (1994), "Automatic abstracting", Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 16, pp. 16-27.
41. Pinto, M. (1995), "Documentary abstracting: toward a methodological model", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 225-34.
42. Pinto, M. (2001a), El Resumen Documental: Paradigmas, Modelos y Metodos, (Documentary Abstract: Paradigms, Models and Methods), 2nd ed., Fundacion German Sanchez Ruiperez, Madrid.
43. Pinto, M. (2001b), "Calidad en la representacion documental ("Quality in documentary representation"), in Lancaster, F.W. and Pinto, M. (Eds), Procesamiento de la Informacion Cientifica (Scientific Information Processing), Arco-Libros, Madrid.
44. Pinto, M. (2003), "Engineering the production of metainformation: the abstracting concern", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 29 No. 5.
45. Pinto, M. and Lancaster, F.W. (1999), "Abstract and abstracting in knowledge discovery", Library Trends, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 234-48.
46. Salager-Meyer, F. (1991), "Medical English abstracts: how well are they structured", Journal of American Information Science, Vol. 42 No. 7, pp. 528-31.
47. Salminen, A. (2000), "Methodology for document analysis", Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 6/7, pp. 299-320.
48. Salton, G. (1989), Automatic Text Processing: the Transformation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY.
49. Salton, G. and McGill, M. (1983), Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
50. Salton, G., Allan, J., Buckley, C. and Singhal, A. (1997), "Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine-readable texts", in Spark Jones, K. and Willett, P. (Eds), Reading in Information Retrieval, Morgan Kaufmann, London, pp. 478-83.
51. Saracevic, T. (1999), "Information science", Journal of American Information Science, Vol. 50 No. 12, pp. 1051-63.
52. Schaffner, C. (1998), "From 'good' to functionally appropriate'", in Schaffner, C. (Ed.), Translation and Quality, Multilingual Matters, Clevendon.
53. Schank, R.C. (1982), "Reminding and memory organization: an introduction to MOP's", in Lehnert, W. and Ringle, M. (Eds), Strategies for Natural Language Processing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 455-98.
54. Sparck Jones, K. (1998), "Automatic summarising: factors and directions", in Mani, I. and Maybury, M. (Eds), Advances in Automatic Text Summarisation, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Sparck Jones, K. and Galliers, J.R. (1996), "Evaluating natural language processing systems", in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin.
56. Spring, M.B. and Campbell, J.D. (2000), "Document processing", Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 67 No. 30, pp. 134-59.
57. Tenopir, C. (1995), "Priorities of quality", in Bash, R. (Ed.), Electronic Information Delivery: Ensuring Quality and Value, Gower, Aldershot.
58. Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1984), Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, NY.
59. Vickery, B. (1997), "Metatheory and information science", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 457-76.
60. Wheatley, A. and Armstrong, C.J. (1997a), A Survey of the Content and Characteristics of Electronic Abstracts, Library Information Technology Centre, London.
61. Wheatley, A. and Armstrong, C.J. (1997b), "Metadata, recall, and abstracts: can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value?", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 49 No. 8, pp. 206-13.
62. Wilson, T. (1999), "Exploring models of information behaviour: the uncertainty project", in Wilson, T.D. and Allen, D.K. (Eds), Exploring the Context of Information Behaviour, Taylor Graham, London.
63. Zaïdi, A. (1990), QFD Quality Function Deployment, Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, Paris.
64. Zhang, J. (2001), "External representations in complex information processing tasks", Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Vol. 68 No. 31, pp. 164-80.