A Modified Principal Component Technique Based on the LASSO

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 531-547

  Jolliffe, Ian T ^a   Trendafilov, Nickolay T ^b   Uddin, Mudassir ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Interpretation; Principal component analysis; Simplification

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141941674     PISSN: 10618600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/1061860032148     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brelman, L. (1995), "Better Subset Regression Using the Nonnegative Garotte," Technometrics, 37, 373-384.
2. Cadima, J., and Jolliffe, I. T. (1995), "Loadings and Correlations in the Interpretation of Principal Components," Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 203-214.
3. _ (2001), "Variable Selection and the Interpretation of Principal Subspaces," Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 6, 62-79.
4. Chu, M. T., and Trendafilov, N. T. (2001), "The Orthogonally Constrained Regression Revisited," Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 1-26.
5. Fu, J. W. (1998), "Penalized Regression: The Bridge Versus the Lasso," Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 397-416.
6. Goffe, W. L., Ferrier, G. D., and Rogers, J. (1994), "Global Optimizations of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing," Journal of Econometrics, 60, 65-99.
7. Hausman, R. (1982), "Constrained Multivariate Analysis," in Optimization in Statistics, eds. S. H. Zanckis and J. S. Rustagi, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 137-151.
8. Helmke, U., and Moore, J. B. (1994), Optimization and Dynamical Systems, London: Springer.
9. Jeffers, J. N. R. (1967), Two Case Studies in the Application of Principal Component Analysis," Applied Statistics, 16, 225-236.
10. Jolliffe, I. T. (1989), "Rotation of Ill-Defined Principal Components," Applied Statistics, 38, 139-147.
11. _ (1995), "Rotation of Principal Components: Choice of Normalization Constraints," Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 29-35.
12. _ (2002), Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Jolliffe, I. T., and Uddin, M. (2000), "The Simplified Component Technique - An Alternative to Rotated Principal Components," Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9, 689-710.
14. Jolliffe I. T., Uddin, M., and Vines, S. K. (2002), "Simplified EOFs - Three Alternatives to Rotation," Climate Research, 20, 271-279.
15. Krzanowski, W. J., and Marriott, F. H. C. (1995), Multivariate Analysis, Part II, London: Arnold.
16. LeBIanc, M., and Tibshirani, R. (1998), "Monotone Shrinkage of Trees," Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 417-433.
17. Morton, S. C. (1989), "Interpretable Projection Pursuit," Technical Report 106, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
18. McCabe, G. P. (1984), "Principal Variables," Technometrics, 26, 137-144.
19. Osborne, M. R., Presnell, B., and Turlach, B. A. (2000), "On the LASSO and its Dual," Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9, 319-337.
20. Tanaka, Y., and Mori, Y. (1997), "Principal Component Analysis Based on a Subset of Variables: Variable Selection and Sensitivity Analysis," American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 17, 61-89.
21. Tibshirani, R. (1996), "Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 267-288.
22. Uddin, M. (1999), "Interpretation of Results from Simplified Principal Components," Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
23. Vines, S. K. (2000), "Simple Principal Components," Applied Statistics, 49, 441-451.