The 'discipline' of post-academic science: Reconstructing the paradigmatic foundations of a virtual research institute

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 251-260

  Hellström, Tomas ^a   Jacob, Merle ^a   Wenneberg, Søren Barlebo ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 0141940572     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154303781780407     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Becher, T (1989), Academic Tribes and Territories: intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).
2. Bush, V (1945), Science: The Endless Frontier (Government Printing Office, Washington DC).
3. Chubin, D E, A L Porter and F A Rossini (1986), "Interdisciplinarity: how do we know thee? - a bibliographic essay", in D E Chubin, A L Porter, F A Rossini and T Connolly (editors), Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and Practice of Problem-Focused Research and Development (Lomond Publications, Maryland).
4. Ernø-Kjølhede, E (2001), Managing Collaborative Research: Unveiling the Microdynamics of the European Triple Helix (Copenhagen Business School Press. Copenhagen).
5. Ernø-Kjølhede, E, K Husted, M Mønsted and S B Wenneberg (2001), "Managing university research in the Triple Helix", Science and Public Policy, 28(1), pages 49-55.
6. Etzkowitz, H (1998), "The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages", Research Policy, 27, pages 823-833.
7. Evans, G R. (1999), Calling Academia into Account (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).
8. Fleck, L (1979), The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
9. Fuller, S (1993), Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI).
10. Fuller, S (1997), "The secularization of science and a new deal for science policy", Futures, 29(6), pages 483-503.
11. Funtowicz, S, and J R Ravetz (1993), "Science for a post-normal age", Futures, 25(7), pages 739-755.
12. Galison, P (1997), Image and Logic: the Material Culture of Microphysics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
13. Geiger, R L (1986), To Advance Knowledge: the Growth of American Research Universities 1900-1940 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
14. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, C Schwartzman, P Scott and M Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society (Sage Publications, London).
15. Golinsky, J (1998), Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
16. Good, G A (2000), "The assembly of geophysics: scientific disciplines as frameworks of consensus", Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31(3), pages 259-292.
17. Guntau, M, and H Laitoko (1991), "On the origins and nature of scientific disciplines", in W R Woodward and R S Cohen (editors), World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation: Science Studies in the German Democratic Republic (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pages 17-28.
18. Hellström, T (2003), "Governing the virtual academic commons", Research Policy, 32, pages 391-401.
19. Kuhn, T (1969), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition, 1st edition 1962).
20. Latour, B (1991), "Technology is society made durable", in J Law (editor), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (Routledge, London) pages 103-131.
21. Latour, B (1998), "From the world of science to the world of research", Science, 280, April, pages 208-209.
22. Laudan, L (1977), Progress and its Problems (University of California Press, Berkeley CA).
23. Laudan, L (1984), Science and Values: the Aims of Science and their Role in Scientific Debate (University of California Press, Berkeley CA).
24. Law, J (1973), "The development of specialities in science: the case of X-ray protein crystallography", Science Studies, 3, pages 275-303.
25. Levi-Strauss, C (1966), The Savage Mind (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
26. Mannheim, K (1976), Ideology and Utopia (Routledge Kegan and Paul, London).
27. Merton, R K (1973), The Sociology of Science: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
28. Merton, R K (1970), Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England (Brighton Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex).
29. Nowotny, H, P Scott and M Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).
30. Weingart, P (1997), "From 'finalization' to 'Mode 2': old wine in new bottles?", Social Science Information, 36(4), pages 591-614.
31. Polanyi, K (1962), "The republic of science: its political and economic theory", Minerva, 1, pages 54-73
32. Popper, K R (1983), "Realism and the aim of society", in W W Bartley (editor), The Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa N.J).
33. Rorty, R (1983), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Blackwell, Oxford).
34. Shapere, D (1964), "The structure of scientific revolutions", Philosophical Review, 73, pages 383-394.
35. Silliman, R H (1974), "Fresnel and the emergence of physics as a discipline", Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 4, pages 137-162.
36. Törnebohm, H (1983), Studies in Knowledge Development (Doxa, Uppsala).
37. Törnebohm, H (1985), "What is theory of science?", Report #145, Department of Theory of Science and Research, Gothenburg University, Sweden.
38. Whitley, R (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd edition).
39. Ziman, J (1994), Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
40. Ziman, J (2000), Real Science: What it is and What it Means (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).