A weekend shopping activity participation model dependent on weekday shopping behavior

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 335-343

  Sugie, Yoriyasu ^a   Zhang, Junyi ^b   Fujiwara, Akimasa ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Inst Social Infrastructure Planning   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODELING; SHOPPING ACTIVITY; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 0141940214     PISSN: 09696989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-6989(02)00053-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge. MA.
2. Dunn, R., Reader, S., Wrigley, N., 1987. A nonparametric approach to the incorporation of heterogeneity into repeated polytomous choice models of urban shopping behaviour. Transportation Research A 21 (4/5), 327-343.
3. Ettema, D., Timmermans, H., 1997. Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Pergamon, New York.
4. Hirsh, M., Prashker, J., Ben-Akiva, M., 1986a. Day-of-the-week models of shopping activity patterns. TRB Record 1085, 63-69.
5. Hirsh, M., Prashker, J., Ben-Akiva, M., 1986b. Dynamic model of weekly activity pattern. Transportation Science 20 (1), 24-36.
6. Jones, P., Dix, M., Clarke, M., Heggie, I., 1983. Understanding Travel Behaviour. Gower, London.
7. Jones, P., Kopplemann, J., Orfeil, J., 1990. Activity analysis: state-of-the-art and future direction. In: Jones, P. (Ed.), Developments in Dynamic and Activity-based Approach to Travel Analysis, Avebury, Aldershot. pp. 34-55.
8. Kitamura, R., 1988a. Review paper: An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation 15 (1), 9-34.
9. Kitamura, R., 1988b. An analysis of weekly activity patterns and travel expenditure. In: Golledge, R., Timmermans, H. (Eds.), Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning, Croom Helm, Beckenhan, Kent, pp. 368-398.
10. Kitamura, R., 1990. Panel analysis in transportation planning: an overview. Transportation Research A 24 (6), 405-415.
11. Popkowski Leszczye, P., Timmermans, H., 1996. An unconditional competing risk hazard model of consumer store-choice dynamics. Environment and Planning A 28 (2), 357-368.
12. Pas, E., 1988. Weekly travel behavior. Transportation 15 (1/2), 89-109.
13. Pas, E., Sundar, S., 1995. Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior: some additional evidence. Transportation 22 (2), 135-150.
14. Special Issue, 1987. Longitudinal data methods. Transportation Research A 21(4/5), 247-376.
15. Special Issue, 1989. Panel analysis of travel demand. Transportation 16(2), 97-194.
16. Special Issue, 1990. Dynamic travel behavior analysis. Transportation Research A 24(6), 399-495.
17. Sugie, Y., 1988. Development and application of activity behavior survey: Part 2. Activity diary survey. Traffic Engineering 23 (7), 71-79 (in Japanese).
18. Sugie, Y., Ashizawa, T., 1995. Characteristics of weekly travel patterns in a Japanese city. Journal of International Development and Cooperation 1 (1), 91-104.
19. Sugie, Y., Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A., 1999. Dynamic discrete choice models considering unobserved heterogeneity with mass point approach. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 3 (5), 245-260.
20. Yamamoto, T., Kitamura, R., 2000. An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-home discretionary activities across working days and non-working days. In: Kitamura, R. (Ed.), Research Report for Monbusho, Kyoto University, Kyoto, pp. 6-23.