Influence of core thickness on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 474-480

  Proos, Kaarel A ^a   Swain, Michael V ^a   Ironside, Jim ^a   Steven, Grant P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; DENTIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MOLAR TOOTH; MOLECULAR MODEL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTIN; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0141924651     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-320.
2. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: A review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:495-510.
3. Hopkins K. An investigation into the role of porcelain thickness in determining the load-carrying capacity of porcelain laminates. Br Dent J 1989;167:201-204.
4. Abed HM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Yaman P. The effect of alumina core thickness on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns [abstract 394]. J Dent Res 1997;76:63.
5. Ironside J. An In Vitro Analysis of the Behaviour of an Alumina Based Dental All-Ceramic Restorative System Subjected to Occlusal Loads [thesis]. Sydney: The University of Sydney, 2001.
6. AlShehri S. An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of InCeram system [abstract 18]. J Dent Res 1999;78:1153.
7. Wagner WC, Chu TM. Apparent flexural strength of porcelain veneered all-ceramic core material [abstract 2129]. J Dent Res 1996;75:284.
8. Proos KA, Steven G, Swain MV, Ironside J. Preliminary studies on the optimum shape of dental bridges. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2000;4:77-92.
9. White SN, Caputo AA, Li ZC, Zhao XY. Modulus of rupture of the Procera all-ceramic system. J Esthet Dent 1996;8:120-126.
10. Odén A, Razzoog ME. "Masking ability" of Procera AllCeram copings of various thickness [abstract 2376]. J Dent Res 1997;76:310.
11. Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-149.
12. Przybylska M, Douglas D. Predicting porcelain thickness for dental shade matches [abstract 336]. J Dent Res 1997;76:55.
13. Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven G. Finite element analysis studies of an all-ceramic crown on a first premolar. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:404-412.
14. Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven G. Finite element analysis studies of a metal-ceramic crown on a first premolar. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:521-527.
15. Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven G. Influence of cement on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:82-90.
16. Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven G. Influence of margin design and taper abutment angle on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:442-449.
17. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Rationalization of incisor shape: Experimental-numerical analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:345-355.
18. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Stress distribution in metal-ceramic crowns with a facial porcelain margin. J Dent Res 1987;66:1493-1498.
19. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B, DeHoff PH. Influence of metal thickness on stress distribution in metal-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1986;65:1173-1178.
20. Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Bayne S, Felton D. Stress concentration in all-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996;27:701-706.
21. Papvasiliou G, Tripodakis A, Kamposiora P, Strub J, Bayne S. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:254-260.
22. Huysmans M, Van der Varst P. Finite element analysis of quasistatic and fatigue failure of posts and cores. J Dent 1993;21:57-64.
23. Magne P, Douglas W. Optimization of resilience and stress distribution in porcelain veneers for the treatment of crown-fractured incisors. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:543-553.
24. Combe E. Notes on Dental Materials. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1986:370-371.
25. Chu G. Glass-ceramics as a new dental porcelain - Its properties and potential applications. In: Yamada H (ed). Dental Porcelain: The State of the Art-1977. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1977:35-40.
26. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Swain MV, Ironside JG. Mechanical properties of InCeram Alumina and InCeram Zirconia [abstract 0911]. J Dent Res 2001;80:640.
27. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 11. St Louis: Mosby, 2002.
28. Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Odén A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR. Procera: A new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1998;29:285-296.
29. Fischer H, Marx R. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: Comparison of bending and indentation method. Dent Mater 2002;18:12-19.
30. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995;11:103-110.
31. Tesk JA, Anusavice KJ. Summary of "Conference on Design of Dental Prostheses." Dent Mater 1988;4:49-50.
32. Hornberger H. Strength Microstructure Relationships in a Dental Alumina Glass Composite [thesis]. Birmingham, UK: The University of Birmingham, 1995:31-32.
33. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-376.