Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: A 5-year retrospective study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 521-523

  Davis, David M ^a   Packer, Mark E ^a   Watson, Roger M ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE REPAIR; DENTURE, COMPLETE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 0141924636     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Clinical results of a 24-team multicenter study of the Brånemark implant. In: The Brånemark Osseointegrated Implant. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:229-232.
3. Batenburg RHK, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Treatment concepts for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:539-545.
4. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Smith DG. Complications and maintenance requirements for implant supported prostheses provided in a UK dental hospital. Br Dent J 1997;182:298-302.
5. Payne AGT, Solomons YF. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:238-245.
6. Watson RM, Davis DM. Follow up and maintenance of implant supported prostheses: A comparison of twenty complete mandibular overdentures and twenty complete mandibular fixed cantilever prostheses. Br Dent J 1996;181:321-327.
7. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A prospective study on the maintenance of implant prostheses in private practice. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:453-458.
8. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1979;6:41-47.
9. Haraldson T, Zarb G. A 10 year follow up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:243-252.
10. Lundqvist S, Haraldson T. Occlusal perception of thickness in patients with bridges on osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:88-92.
11. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparative evaluation of the oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implant Res 1991;2:75-80.
12. Klineberg I, Murray G. Osseoperception: Sensory function and proprioception. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:120-129.
13. Coward TJ, Watson RM. Laboratory planning and techniques for osseointegrated implant treatments. Quintessence Dent Technol 1993;16:17-32.
14. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Falk H, Bergendal T. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial denture supported on osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:197-204.
15. Carr AB, Laney WR. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prostheses and patients with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:101-108.