Four-angle radiographic assessment of cement mantle thickness in cemented total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 914-919

  Kawate, Kenji ^a   Yajima, Hiroshi ^b   Tomita, Yasuharu ^b   Sugimoto, Kazuya ^b   Ohmura, Tetsuji ^b   Hiyoshi, Nobuyuki ^b   Takakura, Yoshinori ^b  

^a NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cement mantle; Cemented total hip arthroplasty; Cementing grade; Oblique radiograph; Radiographic assessment

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0141924424     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00275-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, et al: The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:77, 1994
2. Star MJ, Colwell CW, Kelman GJ, et al: Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure: a retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J Arthroplasty 9:143, 1994
3. Huddleston HD: Femoral lysis after cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:285, 1988
4. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH: Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:966, 1990
5. Kawate K, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CA, et al: Importance of a thin cemnt mantle: autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop 355:70, 1998
6. Kawate K, Ohmura T, Hiyoshi N, et al: Thin cement mantle and osteolysis with a precoated stem. Clin Orthop 365:124, 1999
7. Massoud SN, Hunter JB, Holdsworth BJ, et al: Early femoral loosening in one design of cemented hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:603, 1997
8. Harris WH: Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements? Clin Orthop 285:67, 1992
9. Oishi CS, Walker RH, Colwell CW: The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty: six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 76:1130, 1994
10. Schmalzried TP, Harris WH: Hybrid total hip replacement: a 6.5-year follow-up study. J Bone and Joint Surg Br 75:608, 1993
11. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
12. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, Poss R: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:161, 1990
13. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH: Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques: a fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1845, 1995
14. Goldberg BA, Al-Habbal G, Noble PC, et al: Proximal and distal femoral centralizers in modern cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 349:163, 1998
15. Harvey EJ, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD: Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:396, 1998
16. Kelly AJ, Lee MB, Wong NS, et al: Poor reproducibility in radiographic grading of femoral cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:525, 1996