|
Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 16-26
|
Physiologic versus anatomic repair of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADAPTATION;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE;
AGED;
ANASTOMOSIS;
CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION;
CHILD;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION;
FEMALE;
GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION;
HEART FUNCTION TEST;
HEART SURGERY;
HEMODYNAMICS;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MORTALITY;
NEWBORN;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REVIEW;
SURVIVAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASCULAR SURGERY;
ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
AGED;
ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL;
CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
CARDIOVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
FEMALE;
HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL;
HEART FUNCTION TESTS;
HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREGNANCY;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
TRANSPOSITION OF GREAT VESSELS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
|
EID: 0141922713
PISSN: 10929126
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1053/pcsu.2003.50015 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (23)
|
References (47)
|