Validation of an on-line implementation of the Imitative Test of Speech Pattern Contrast Perception (IMSPAC)

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 72-82

  Kosky, Christine ^a   Boothroyd, Arthur ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b City University New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory perception; Hearing loss; Hearing test; Phonetic contrast perception; Speech perception test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; HEARING; HUMAN; IMITATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHONATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHILD; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION; PHONATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0141922671     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14.2.3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boothroyd A (1984) Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27:134-144
2. Boothroyd A (1985). Evaluation of speech production in the hearing impaired: Some benefits of forced-choice testing Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 28:185-196
3. Boothroyd A (1991). Speech perception measures and their role in the evaluation of hearing aid performance. In: Feigin JA and Stelmachowicz PG. (Eds.). Pediatric Amplification: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference. (pp 77-92). Omaha, NE: Boys Town National Research Hospital.
4. Boothroyd A (1998). Evaluating the efficacy of hearing aids and cochlear implants in children with hearing impairment. In, Bess FH. (Ed.). Children with hearing impairment: Contemporary trends. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt, Bill Wilkerson Press.
5. Boothroyd A, Eran O and Hanin L. (1996). Speech perception and production in children with hearing impairment. In, Bess FH, Gravel JS and Tharpe AM. (Eds.). Amplification for children with auditory deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press.
6. Brandy WT (2002). Speech audiometry In: Katz J. (Ed). Handbook of clinical audiology. pp 96-110. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
7. Eran O. (1996). The effects of age, input modality, and evaluation method on the measured speech imitation performance of profoundly hearing-impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
8. Erber NP. (1972). Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 15:413-422.
9. Kosky C and Boothroyd A. (2003). Perception and production of sibilants by children with hearing loss: A training study. The Volta Review, 103:71-98.
10. Mactony J, Risberg A, Spens KE and Agelfors E. (1972). Results of a rhyme test for speech audiometry. In Fant, G. (Ed.). Speech communication ability and profound deafness. Washington, D.C.: A.G. Bell Assoc. for the Deaf.
11. McGarr N. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26:451-458.
12. Pickett JM, Martin ES, Johnson D, Brandsmith S, Daniel A, Willis D and Otis W. (1972). On patterns of speech feature perception by deaf listeners. In Fant G. (Ed.). Speech communication ability and profound deafness. (pp. 119-121) Washington, D.C.: AG. Bell Assoc. for the Deaf.
13. Raphael L. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 51:1296-1303.
14. Risberg A. (1976). Diagnostic rhyme test for speech audiometry with severely hard of hearing and profoundly deaf children. Speech Transmission Laboratory QPSR, 2-3:51-61. Stockholm: Karolinska Technical Institute.
15. Shavelson RJ and Webb NM. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. London: Sage publications.
16. Tyler RS. (1993). Speech perception in children. Chapter 5, in Tyler RS. (Ed.) Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.