Foreign access to shared marine genetic materials: Management options for a quasi-fugacious resource

Ocean Development and International Law

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 297-348

  McLaughlin, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Convention on biological diversity; Marine genetic resources

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; GENETIC RESOURCE; MARINE RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0141920460     PISSN: 00908320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00908320390221858     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Environmental Policy Studies Workshop, Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, Access to Genetic Resources: An Evaluation of the Development and Implementation of Recent Regulation and Access Agreements, Environmental Policy Studies Working Paper #4 (1999).
2. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, REPORT OF THE LIAISON GROUP MEETING ON ECOSYSTEM APPROACH, September 15-17, 1999.
3. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, PRACTICAL APPROACHES FOR CAPACITY BUILDING FOR TAXONOMY, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/2/5, July 19, 1996.
4. Andrew Pollack, Patenting Life: A Special Report: Biological Products Raise Genetic Ownership Issues, NEW YORK TIMES, November 26, 1999, at A1.
5. National Academy of Sciences, MONSOONS TO MICROBES: UNDERSTANDING THE OCEANIC ROLE IN HUMAN HEALTH 73 (1999).
6. F. GRIFO, et al., The Origins of Prescription Drugs, in BIODIVERSITY AND HUMAN HEALTH (F. Grifo and J. Rosenthal, eds. 1997)
7. Edward O. Wilson, THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE 283 (1992).
8. Lyle Glowka, et al., Best Practices for Access to Genetic Resources, Information Paper commissioned by DG XI, European Commission and the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, section 2.1 (April 1998), available at http://www.biodev.de/English/contents.html.
9. Gabriele M. Konig and Anthony D. Wright, Marine Natural Products Research: Current Directions and Future Potential, 62 PLANTA MEDICA 193, 193-211 (1996).
10. Lyle Glowka, A Guide to Designing Legal Frameworks to Determine Access to Genetic Resources, Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 34, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, (1998).
11. Study of Complementary Options to Address Access and Benefit-Sharing in the Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Panel of Experts on Access and Benefit Sharing, UNEP/CBD/EP-ABS/2/INF/1, January 30, 2001.
12. Stephen Polasky, Biodiversity Bibliography: Ecology, Economy and Policy at http://www.apec.umn.edu/faculty/spolasky/biobib.html (providing a thorough, if somewhat dated, summary of the literature).
13. John Ntambirweki, Biotechnology and International Law Within the North South Context, 14 TRANSNAT'L LAW. 103, 107 (2001).
14. William Lesser, SUSTAINABLE USE OF GENETIC RESOURCES UNDER THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: EXPLORING ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING 4 (1998).
15. Edgar J. Asebey and Jill D. Kempenaar, Biodiversity Prospecting: Fulfilling the Mandate of the Biodiversity Convention, 28 VAND, J. TRANSNAT'L L. 703, 738 (1995)
16. Joseph Henry Vogel, The Successful Use of Economic Instruments for Foster Sustainable Use of Biodiversity: Six Case Studies from Latin America and the Caribbean. Case Study 6: Bioprospering, BIOPOLICY JOURNAL Paper 5 (PY97005), 1997 at http://www.bdt.org/bioline/py.
17. Nico Schriver, SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES 131-32(1997);
18. Alberto Szekely, The International Law of Submarine Transboundary Hydrocarbon Resources: Legal Limits to Behavior and Experiences for the Gulf of Mexico, 26 NAT. RESOURCES J. 733, 735-736 (1986)
19. Randall C. Willis, Nature's Pharma Sea, MODERN DRUG DISCOVERY, January 2002, at 32-38.
20. Elliott A. Norse, GLOBAL MARINE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 14-15 (1993)
21. Kushal Qanungo, Time for a New Deal on Marine Bioprospecting, at http://www.scidev.net/index.asp (date posted Jan. 17, 2002).
22. David Farrier and Linda Tucker, Access to Marine Bioresources: Hitching the Conservation Cart to the Bioprospecting Horse, 32 OCEAN DEV. & INT'L L. 213, 215-216 (2001).
23. R. A. Zilinskas, et al., THE GLOBAL CHALLENGE OF MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY: A STATUS REPORT ON THE UNITED STATES, JAPAN, AUSTRALIA, AND NORWAY (1995).
24. Brad K. Carte and Randall K. Johnson, Topotecan Development: An Example of the Evolution of Natural Product Drug Discovery Research, in MEDICINAL RESOURCES OF THE TROPICAL FOREST 85 (M. Balick et al., eds., 1996).
25. DRUGS FROM THE SEA (N. Fusetani ed., 2000);
26. Pushkar N. Kaul, Drug Discovery: Past, Present and Future, in 50 PROGRESS IN DRUG DISCOVERY 25-33 (J. Jucker ed., 1998);
27. Paul R. Jensen and William Fenical, Marine Microorganisms and Drug Discovery: Current Status and Future Potential, Fusetani, supra note 36, at 6-29.
28. Motomasa Kobayashi, Search for Biologically Active Substances from Marine Sponges, in Fusetani, supra note 36, at 46.
29. www.hboi.edu/dbmr/new_partners.html.
30. John Henkel, Drugs of the Deep: Treasures of The Sea Yield Some Medical Answers and Hint at Others, FDA CONSUMER MAGAZINE, Jan.-Feb. 1998, at 30, available at http://www.fda.gov/dac/features/1998/198_deep.html.
31. E. A. Evans-Illidge and P. T. Murphy, A New Approach to Benefit Sharing in Bioprospecting, at www.diodiv.org/programmes/socio-eco/benefit/case-studies.asp (last updated Mar. 15, 2002)
32. Marine Bioprospecting for the National Cancer Institute: From the Coral Reef Research Foundation in Palau: Dr. Patrick Colin Discusses the Realities of Marine Collecting, www.reefnet.org/issue7/research7.html
33. D. Davidson et al., Development of Pharmaceutical Companies Based on Plant Products: Suggested Approaches, in Balick, supra note 33, at 25.
34. James D. McChesney, Biological Diversity, Chemical Diversity, and the Search for New Pharmaceuticals, in Balick, supra note 33, at 12-15.
35. Kevin W. McCabe, The January 1999 Review of Article 27 of the TRIPs Agreement: Diverging Views of Developed and Developing Countries Toward the Patentability of Biotechnology, 6 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 41, 48 n. 25.
36. Colin Macilwain, When Rhetoric Hits Reality in Debate on Bioprospecting, 392 NATURE, Apr. 9, 1998 at 535
37. Karen Young Kreeger, In the Clinic/On the Shelf: Denizens of the Deep, THE SCIENTIST, April 1, 1996, at 1, 8-9.
38. Steven M. Rubin and Stanwood C. Fish, Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Innovative Contractual Provisions to Foster Ethnobotanical Knowledge, Technology, and Conservation, 5 COLO. J. INT'L ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 23 (1994)
39. Muria Kruger, Harmonizing TRIPs and the CBD: A Proposal From India, 10 MINN. J. GLOBAL TRADE 169, (2001)
40. Robert J. Gutowski, The Marriage of Intellectual Property and International Trade in the TRIPs Agreement: Strange Bedfellows or a Match Made in Heaven? 47 BUFF L. REV. 713, 720 (1999).
41. Carrie P. Smith, Patenting Life: The Potential and Pitfalls of Using the WTO to Globalize Intellectual Property Rights, 26 N.C. J. INT'L L. & COM. REG. 143, 148.
42. Keith Aoki, Neocolonialism, Anticommons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not So Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection, 6 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 11 (1998)
43. Mark A. Urbanski, Chemical Prospecting, Biodiversity Conservation, and the Importance of Intellectual Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Biological Materials, 2 BUFF. J. INT'L L. 131, 170 (1995)
44. Craig H. Allen, Protecting the Oceanic Gardens of Eden: International Law Issues in Deep-Sea Vent Resource Conservation and Management, 13 GEO. INT'L ENVTL. L. REP. 563, 655 (2001).
45. Jim Chen, Diversity and Deadlock: Transcending Conventional Wisdom on the Relationship Between Biological Diversity and Intellectual Property. 31 ENVTL. L. REP. 10625, 10637-10639
46. Robert Hudec, ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN GATT LEGAL SYSTEM (1993).
47. Jeanne J. Grimmett, Congressional Research Service, World Trade Organization: Institutional Issues and Dispute Settlement, CRS-2 (Aug. 3, 1994).
48. WTO Homepage, available at http://www.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e.htm.
49. Xiao-Lin Zhou, U.S.-China Trade Dispute and China's Intellectual Property Rights Protection, in INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 414 (Anthony D'Amato and Doris Estelle Long eds., 1997)
50. Klaus Bosselmann, Plants and Politics: The International Legal Regime Concerning Biotechnology and Biodiversity, 7 COLO. J. INT'L ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 111, 127
51. J. M. Spectar, Patent Necessity: Intellectual Property Dilemmas in the Biotech Domain & Treatment Equity for Developing Countries. 24 Hous. J. INT'L. L. 227 (2002).
52. Marcus Nolff, Compulsory Patent Licensing in View of the WTO Ministerial Conference Declaration on the TRIPs Agreement and Public Health, 84 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 133 (Feb. 2002).
53. J. H. Reichman, Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection Under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement, 29 INT'L LAW. 345, 358-359 (1995).
54. Richard J. McLaughlin, Settling Trade-Related Disputes Over the Protection of Marine Living Resources: UNCLOS or WTO? 10 GEO. INT'L ENVT.L L. REV. 29, 41-47 (1997).
55. Lee A. Kimball, THE LAW OF THE SEA: PRIORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN IMPLEMENTING THE CONVENTION, (IUCN-The World Conservation Union 1995).
56. Christopher C. Joyner, Biodiversity In the Marine Environment: Resource Implications for the Law of the Sea, 28 VAND. J TRANSNAT'L L. 635 (1995).
57. William t. Burke, THE NEW INTERNATIONAL LAW OF FISHERIES 139-141 (1994)
58. United Nations General Assembly's Declaration on the Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources. G.A. Res. 3281, UN GAOR, 29th Sess., Supp. No. 31, at 51, U.N. Doc. A/9631 (1974).
59. George Elian, THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES (1979).
60. Lyle Glowka, Emerging Legislative Approaches to Implement Article 15 of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 6 RECIEL 249 (1997)
61. Dennis Michaels, Bioprospecting Agreements: Forging a Comprehensive Strategy for Managing Genetic Resources on Public Lands, 22 SPG ENVIRONS ENVTL. L & POL'Y J. 3 (1999);
62. Michael D. Coughlin, Jr., Using the Merck-Inbio Agreement to Clarify the Convention on Biological Diversity, 31 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 337 (1993).
63. http://www.ttb.nci.hih.gov/npmou.html.
64. Rene-Jean Dupuy and Daniel Vignes. A HANDBOOK ON THE NEW LAW OF THE SEA. 257-258 (1991)
65. Barbara Kwiatkowsak, THE 200 MILE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE IN THE NEW LAW OF THE SEA (1989) 46-50, 60-61 (1989).
66. Harry N. Scheiber, The Biodiversity Convention and Access to Marine Genetic Materials in Ocean Law, in ORDER FOR THE OCEANS AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY (Davor Vidas and Willy Ostreng, eds. 1999) at 187-201;
67. William T. Burke, State Practice, New Ocean, and Ocean Governance under UNCLOS, in OCEAN GOVERNANCE: STRATEGIES AND APPROACHES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (Thomas A. Mensah, ed. 1996).
68. Bruce N. Shibles, Implications of an International Legal Standard for Transboundary Management of Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank Fishery Resources, 1 OCEAN & COASTAL L.J. 1, 1 n. 2 (1994).
69. Ellen Hey, THE REGIME FOR THE EXPLOITATION OF TRANSBOUNDARY MARINE FISHERIES 82 (1989)
70. Richard J. McLaughlin, UNCLOS and the Demise of the United States' Use of Trade Sanctions to Protect Dolphins, Sea Turtles, Whales, and Other Marine Living Resources, 21 ECOL. L.Q. 1, 39 (1994)
71. Afred A. Soons, MARINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE LAW OF THE SEA 167-168 (1982).
72. Lawrence Juda, Rio Plus Ten: The Evolution of International Fisheries Governance, 33 OCEAN DEV. & INT'L L. 109, 115-128 (2002).
73. William T. Burke, The Law of the Sea Convention and Fishing Practices of Nonsignatories, With Special Reference to the United States, in CONSENSUS AND CONFRONTATION: THE UNITED STATES AND THE LAW OF THE CONVENTION 315 (Jon M. Van Dyke, ed. 1985);
74. Bernard H. Oxman, Customary International Law and the Exclusive Economic Zone, in Consensus and Confrontation: The United States and the Law of the Sea Convention 157 (Jon M. Van Dyke, ed. 1985);
75. Oscar Schacter, SHARING THE WORLD's RESOURCES (1977).
76. ALEXANDRE KISS AND DINAH SHELTON, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 105-107 (1991);
77. Lakshman Guruswamy et al., INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND WORLD ORDER 348 (1999);
78. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES §§601-604 and comments (1987).
79. Frederic L. Kirgis, PRIOR CONSULTATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: A STUDY OF STATE PRACTICE 81 (1983).
80. Aaron Schwabach, The United Nations Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, Customary International Law, and the Interests of Developing Upper Riparians, 33 TEX. INT'L L.J. 257, 260 (1998).
81. DRAFT PRINCIPLES OF CONDUCT IN THE FIELD OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE GUIDANCE OF STATES IN THE CONSERVATION AND HARMONIOUS UTILIZATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHARED BY TWO OR MORE STATES, U.N. Doc. UNEP/IG.12/2, 17 I.L.M. 1097 (1978).
82. BRIAN D. SMITH, STATE RESPONSIBILITY AND THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT: THE RULES OF DECISION (1988)
83. Gunther Handl, The Principle of "Equitable Use" as Applied to Internationally Shared Natural Resources: Its Role in Resolving Potential International Disputes over Transfrontier Pollution, REV. BELGE DE DROIT INT'L 40, 61 (1978-1979).
84. Alan E. Boyle, State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences Not Prohibited by International Law: a Necessary Distinction? 39 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 1, 21-24 (1990).
85. Jon Van Dyke, Sharing Ocean Resources-In a Time of Scarcity of Selfishness, in LAW OF THE SEA: THE COMMON HERITAGE AND EMERGING CHALLENGES 27-28 (Harry N. Scheiber, ed. 2000).
86. Advisory Opinion on Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 Between the WHO and Egypt, [1980] I.C.J. REPORTS 73, 92-94.
87. Lake Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain) 24 INT'L L. REP. 101, 139 (1957).
88. Advisory Opinion No. 42, Railway Traffic. Between Litguania and Poland, [1931] P.C. I. J. (Ser. A/B) No. 42, at 116.
89. Rainer Lagoni, Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreements, 78 AM. J. INT'L L. 345, 355
90. Rainer Lagoni, Oil and Gas Deposits Across National Frontiers, 73 AM J. INT'L L. 215, n. 2. (1979)
91. Moritaka Hayashi, The Role of the United Nations in Managing the World's Fisheries, in THE PEACEFUL MANAGEMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY (Gerald Blake et al., eds. 1995)
92. Kristen M. Fletcher, The International Whale Regime and U.S. Foreign Policy, in THE ENVIRONMENT, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY 219 (Paul G. Harris, ed. 2001).
93. James Salzman et al., Protecting Ecosystem Services: Science, Economics, Policy, 20 STAN. ENVTL. L.J. 309 (2001).
94. Eyal Benvenisti, Collective Action in the Utilization of Shared Freshwater: The Challenges of International Water Resources Law, 90 AM. J. INT'L. L. 384, 388 (1996)
95. Masahiro Miyoshi, THE JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS IN RELATION TO MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION 7-37 (International Boundaries Research Unit, Maritime Briefing No. 5, 1999)
96. Eugene Kuntz, A TREATISE ON THE LAW OF OIL AND GAS 111-119 (1987).
97. Walter L. Summers, The Modern Theory of Practical Application of Statutes for the Conservation of Oil and Gas, 13 TUL. L. REV. 1, 8 (1938).
98. R. O. Kellam, A Century of Correlative Rights, 12 BAYLOR L. REV. 1, 42 (1959)
99. Carl Coke Rister, OIL! TITAN OF THE SOUTHWEST 92 (1949)
100. Jacqueline Lang Weaver, The Federal Government as a Useful Enemy: Perspectives on the Bush Energy/Environmental Agenda from the Texas Oilfields, 19 PACE ENVT'L. REV. 1-48 (2001)
101. William T. Onorato, Apportionment of an International Common Petroleum Deposit, 17 INT'L AND COMP. L.Q. 85, 92-93 (1968)
102. Maurice H. Merrill, THE PUBLIC'S CONCERN WITH THE FUEL MINERALS 32 (1960).
103. Anshutz Corp. v. Wyo. Oil & Gas Conservation Commin. 923 P.2d 751, 757 n.1 (Wyo. 1996).
104. Summers, THE LAW OF OIL AND GAS 192-400 (William J. Flittie, ed. 1966)
105. Eugene Kuntz, Correlative Rights in Oil and Gas, 30 MISS. L.J. 1-9 (1958)
106. William T. Onorato, Apportionment of an International Common Petroleum Deposit, 26 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 324, 332-333 (1977).
107. Jacqueline Lang Weaver, Armtwisting Operators and Owners to Unitize: The Role of State Conservation Commissions in Preventing Waste, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL INSTITUTE ON OIL AND GAS LAW AND TAXATION 4-4 (Carol J. Holgren, ed. 1987).
108. Jared C. Bennett, Ownership of Transmigratory Minerals, Utah and Zebras: Proof that Oil and Gas Ownership Needs Reform, 21 J. LAND RESOURCES & ENVT'L L. 349, 350 (2001)
109. David Ong, South-East Asian State Practice on the Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits, in THE PEACEFUL MANAGEMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RESOURCES 82-92 (G. Blake et al. eds. 1995)
110. David M. Ong, Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: "Mere" State Practice or Customary International Law, 93 9 AM. J. INT'L L. 771, 792.
111. Charles Robson, Transboundary Petroleum Reservoirs: Legal Issues and Solutions, in THE PEACEFUL MANAGEMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RESOURCES 8 (G. Blake et al., eds. 1995)
112. Lea Brilmayer and Natalie Klein, Land and Sea: Two Sovereign Regimes in Search of a Common Denominator, N.Y.U. J. INT'L L. & POL. 703, 734 (2001).
113. Ian Townsend-Gault and William G. Stormont, Offshore Petroleum Joint Development Arrangements: Functional Instrument? Compromise? Obligation?, in Blake, supra note 246, at 60.
114. Ludwik A. Teclaff, Fiat of Custom: The Checkered Development of International Water Law, 31 NAT. RESOURCES J, 45, 65-66 (1991)
115. Dante A. Caponera, Shared Waters and International Law, in Blake, supra note 246, at 121-126.
116. Gabriel Eckstein, Application of International Water Law to Transboundary Groundwater Resources, and the Slovak-Hungarian Dispute over Gabcikovo-Nagymaros, 19 SUFFOLK TRANSNAT'L L. REV. 67, 73 (1995).
117. Bonaya Adhi Godana, AFRICA'S SHARED WATER RESOURCES: LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE NILE, NIGER, AND SENEGAL RIVER SYSTEMS 36-39 (1985)
118. Donald J. Chenevert, Jr., Application of the Draft Articles on the Non-Navigation Uses of International Watercourses to the Water Disputes Involving the Nile and the Jordan River, 6 EMORY INT'L L. REV. 495, 503-504 (1992)
119. Melanne Andromecca Civic, A New Conceptual Framework for Jordan River Basin Management: A Proposal for a Trusteeship Commission, 9 COLO. J. INT'L ENVTL, L. & POL'Y 285, 296 n. 64 (1998).
120. Jonathan M. Wenig, Water and Peace: The Past, The Present, and The Future of the Jordan River Watercourse: An International Law Analysis, N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 331, 346 (1995)
121. International Law Commission Report on the Draft Articles on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, 43rd Sess., U.N. GAOR, 46th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/46/10 (1991) and 30 I.L.M. 1554 (1991).
122. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, FURTHER ADVANCEMENT OF THE GLOBAL TAXONOMY INITIATVE, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/4/6, January 1999.
123. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, REVIEW OF THE GLOBAL TAXONOMY INITIATIVE, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/5/4, 23 October 1999, at 8-9.
124. http://www.lclark.edu/~ielp/brazilgenetic.htm:
125. http://www.lclark.edu/~ielp/costaricaenglish.htm.
126. http://www.lclark.edu/~ielp/philippinesenglish.htm:
127. http://www.lclark.edu/~ielp/andeanpactenglish.html.
128. John Charles Kunich, Fiddling Around While the Hotspots Burn Out, 14 GEO. INT'L ENVTL. L. Rev. 179, 221-225
129. http://www.belize-guatemala.gov.bz/belize_position.html.
130. http://www.mbrs.org.bz/english/en_index.htm.
131. Daniel B. Botkin, DISCORDANT HARMONIES: A NEW ECOLOGY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY 10 (1990)
132. Kenneth Sherman, Modular Approach to the Monitoring and Assessment of Large Marine Ecosystems, in THE GULF OF MEXICO LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEM: ASSESSMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, AND MANAGEMENT 34-63 (H. Kumpf et al., eds 1999).
133. THE WORLD CONSERVATION UNION (IUCN), THE LAW OF THE SEA: PRIORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN IMPLEMENTING THE CONVENTION (1995).
134. Steve Charnovitz, "A Taxonomy of Environmental Trade Measures," 6 GEO. INT'L ENVTL. L. REV. 1 (1993)
135. Richard J. McLaughlin, Sovereignty, Utility, and Fairness: Using U.S. Takings Law to Guide the Evolving Utilitarian Balancing Approach to Global Environmental Disputes in the WTO, 78 OR. L. REV. 855, 880-890 (1999)