Acknowledgement of psychiatric research funding

British Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 183, Issue OCT., 2003, Pages 273-275

  Henderson, Claire ^a   Howard, Louise ^a   Wilkinson, Greg ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PSYCHIATRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCISEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PSYCHIATRY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 0141919550     PISSN: 00071250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.4.273     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Barnes, D. E. & Bero, L. A. (1998) Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA, 279, 1566-1570.
2. Black. N. & Davies, S. (1999) Where do UK health services researchers publish their findings? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 92, 129-131.
3. Chaudhry, S., Schroter, S., Smith, R., et al (2002) Does declaration of competing interest affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial. BMJ, 325, 1391-1392.
4. Davidoff, F., DeAngelis, C. D., Drazen, J. M., et al (2001) Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 825-826.
5. Dawson, G., Lucocq, B., Cottrell, R., et al (1998) Mapping the landscape. National Biomedical Research Outputs 1988-95, London: Wellcome Trust.
6. Howard, L. & Wilkinson, G. (1998) Peer review and editorial decision-making. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 110-113.
7. Hussain, A. & Smith, R. (2001) Declaring financial competing interests: survey of five general medical journals. BMJ, 323, 263-264.
8. Lewison, G., Dawson, G. & Anderson, J. (1995) The behaviour of biomedical scientific authors in acknowledging their funding sources. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 255-264. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
9. Smith, R. (2001) Journals fail to adhere to guidelines on conflict of interest. BMJ, 323, 651.
10. _ (2002) Making progress with competing interests. BMJ, 325, 1375-1376.
11. Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., O'Rourke, K., et al (1998) Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 101-106.
12. Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2000) Competing interests and controversy about third generation oral contraceptives. BMJ, 320, 381.