The use of information technology among young adults - Experience, attitudes and health beliefs

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 565-570

  Gustafsson, Ewa ^a   Dellve, Lotta ^a   Edlund, Maria ^a   Hagberg, Mats ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Information and communication technology; Qualitative method; Quality of life; Social values

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONNEL;

INTERVIEWS;

ERGONOMICS;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOINFORMATICS; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY; THEORY;

EID: 0141918778     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00082-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bergström, A., 2001. Internet - from revolution to everyday use. In: Holmberg, S., Weibull, L. (Eds.), Land, Du välsignade?: SOM-undersökningen 2000. SOM-institutet, Univ. -(SOM-rapport, 0284-4788;26), Göteborg, pp. 283-296 (in Swedish).
2. Blum R.W. Healthy youth development as a model for youth health promotion. J. Adolesc. Health. 22:1998;368-375.
3. Bradley G. The information and communication society. how people will live and work in the new millennium Ergonomics. 43(7):2000;844-857.
4. Bradley G., Bradley L. Home of the future and ICT - integration of professional and private roles. Bradley G. Humans on the Net: Information & Communication Technology (ICT). 2001;197-222 Work Organisation and Human Beings, Stockholm, Prevent.
5. Bradley G., Robertson M. Computers, psychosocial work environment and stress. A comparative theoretical analysis of organizations and action strategies. Quéinnec Y., Daniellou F. Designing for Everyone: Proceedings of the 11th Congress International Ergonomics Association. 1991;771-773 Taylor & Francis, London.
6. Carayon P. Information & communication technology and work organization. achieving a balanced system Bradley G. Humans on the Net: Information & Communication Technology (ICT). 2001;119-138 Work Organisation and Human Beings, Stockholm, Prevent.
7. Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist method. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition. 2000;509-536 Sage, California.
8. Dellve L., Henning-Abrahamsson K., Trulsson U., Hallberg L.R.-M. Grounded theory in public health research. Hallberg L.R.-M. Qualitative Research Methods in Public Health. 2002;Studentlitteratur, Lund.
9. Folkman S. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc. Sci. Med. 45:1997;1207-1221.
10. Glaser B. Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. 1978;Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
11. Glaser B., Strauss A. The discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research:1969;Aldine, Chicago.
12. House J.S., Kahn R. Measures and concepts of social support. Cohen S., Syme L. Social Support and Health. 1985;Academic Press, New York.
13. Karasek R., Theorell T. Healthy Work. Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. 1990;Basic Books, Inc. New York.
14. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. 1984;Springer Publishing Company, New York.
15. NORDICOM-Sveriges mediebarometer, 2001. Göteborg: Nordiskt informationscenter för medie-och kommunikationsforskning, cop. 2002 (in Swedish).
16. Roberts D.F. Media and youth. access, exposure, and privatization J. Adolesc. Health. 27(2 Suppl.):2000;8-14.
17. Seligman M.E.P. Helplessness. 1975;W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
18. Statistics Sweden, 1999. The Working Environment 1999 (AM 68 SM 0001).