Continuity and change: Public sector pay review bodies, 1992-2003

Public Money and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 229-236

  Horsman, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141907388     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00377     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AFPRB (1996), 25th Report, Cm 3091 (The Stationery Office, London), para. 14.
2. Department of Health (2003), Agenda for Change, Proposed Agreement on Modern Pay and Conditions for NHS Staff (London).
3. DDRB (1995), 24th Report, Cm 2460 (The Stationery Office, London).
4. DDRB (1996), 25th Report, Cm 2760 (The Stationery Office, London).
5. DDRB (1997), 26th Report, Cm 3535 (The Stationery Office, London).
6. HM Treasury (2002), Spending Review White Paper, Opportunity and Security for All: Investing in a Fairer, More Enterprising Britain (London), table A3.
7. NAPRB (1997), 14th Report, Cm 3538 (The Stationery Office, London), second main finding.
8. NAPRB (2000), 18th Report, Cm 4991 (The Stationery Office, London), para. 3.22.
9. STRB (2000), Special Review of the Threshold Standards for Classroom Teachers, Cm 4898 (The Stationery Office, London).
10. STRB (2001a), 10th Report, Cm 4990 (The Stationery Office, London).
11. STRB (2001b), Special Review of the Welcome Back Bonus for Returners to Teaching in England, Cm 5174 (The Stationery Office, London).
12. STRB (2002a), 11th Report, Cm 5353 (The Stationery Office, London).
13. STRB (2002b), Special Review of Approaches to Reducing Teacher Workload, Cm 5497 (The Stationery Office, London).
14. STRB (2003), 12th Report, Cm 5715 (The Stationery Office, London), appendix A.