Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: Effects of film speed and density

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 441-448

  Sheaffer, J Chris ^a   Eleazer, Paul D ^b   Scheetz, James P ^a   Clark, Stephen J ^a   Farman, Allan G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ENDODONTICS; ERROR; IMAGE QUALITY; MAXILLA; OPTICAL DENSITY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0141887435     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00035-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. von der Lehr W.N., Marsh R.A. A radiographic study of the point of endodontic egress. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 35:1973;105-109. Seidberg B.H., Alibrandi B.V., Fine H., Logue B. Clinical investigation of measuring working lengths of root canals with an electronic device and with digital-tactile sense. J Am Dent Assoc. 90:1975;379-387.
2. Seidberg B.H., Alibrandi B.V., Fine H., Logue B. Clinical investigation of measuring working lengths of root canals with an electronic device and with digital-tactile sense. J Am Dent Assoc. 90:1975;379-387.
3. Pratten D.H., McDonald N.J. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. J Endod. 22:1996;173-176.
4. Ellingsen M.A., Harrington G.W., Hollender L.G. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination Part 1. In vitro evaluation . J Endod. 21:1995;326-331.
5. Ellingsen M.A., Hollender L.G., Harrington G.W. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination II. In vivo evaluation . J Endod. 21:1995;516-520.
6. Brown R., Hadley J.N., Chambers D.W. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination. J Endod. 24:1998;54-56.
7. Sheaffer J.C., Eleazer P.D., Scheetz J.P., Clark S.J., Farman A.G. A comparison of D-, E-, and F- speed conventional intraoral radiographic films in endodontic measurement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 93:2002;337-340.
8. Manson-Hing L.R. Vision and oral roentegenology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 15:1962;173-183. Degering C.I. Radiography of dental fractures. An experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 30:1970;213-219.
9. Degering C.I. Radiography of dental fractures. An experimental evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 30:1970;213-219.
10. Farman T.T., Farman A.G. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 29:2000;41-45.
11. Mourshed F. A study of intraoral radiographic errors made by dental students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 32:1971;824-828.
12. Patel J.R. Intraoral radiographic errors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 48:1979;479-483. Tamse A., Kaffe I., Fishel D. Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 50:1980;563-566.
13. Tamse A., Kaffe I., Fishel D. Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 50:1980;563-566. Bean L.R. Comparison of bisecting angle and paralleling methods of intraoral radiology. J Dent Educ. 33:1969;441-445.
14. Bean L.R. Comparison of bisecting angle and paralleling methods of intraoral radiology. J Dent Educ. 33:1969;441-445.